this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

DeGoogle Yourself

8519 readers
2 users here now

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

  1. Be respectful even in disagreement

  2. No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.

  3. No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Greetings! I have recently ditched google and went with privacy focused alternatives. Such as SearXNG, Invidious, Lemmy etc.

However, while i was using degoogled chromium, i cant install extensions.

Is there any way i can install extensions on Degoogled Chromium? (ik this isnt the right place to ask but eh)

Thanks a lot!

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Agree with a lot of the comments here, whether it's privacy or not wanting to use GAFAMmmy tools, there are better options than ungoogled chromium. For privacy: https://privacytests.org/ (maintainer works at Brave, but by and large this site is useful)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If I were you and needed to use a chromium based browser, I would go for brave with maximum privacy settings turned on and all the Crypto shit and brave "features" turned off. Ungoogled chromium is a good project but its not as refined as Brave is. See here: https://privacytests.org/

If I were you I'd go for Librewolf or Mullvad browser if you dont need Chromium. The reason people say this is because Google has a sort of monopoly on the browser space right now as Chromium takes up Almost 80% of the marketshare, meaning that Google will ultimately get to decide what features live, and what features die. If Chromium market share was down at 40% or so, it wouldnt matter if you used Brave or not, but thats the reality we live in.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't use Brave. Brave is virtually a spyware, just less invasive compared to Chrome: https://spyware.neocities.org/articles/brave

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Well. I wasn't "Brave" enough to use it, so yea.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't remember many details so you have to wait for more competent replies but afaik there are 2 ways of getting extensions working on UGC: download the extension file using some workarounds and install it manually, or install a special proprietary module that enables Chrome extension store so you can use it like on Chrome.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

ditch chromium and use firefox

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Chromium has its advantages too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Citation needed

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Can you really consider yourself degoogled if you use a Chromecast??

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then have chromium installed for chromecast only and Firefox installed for normal browsing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's what I do, just pointing out that it's factually incorrect to say there's no point to chromium. Everyone's just proselytizing, probably the same nerds who mock apple fanboys.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Dont use chromecast

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Compatibility, security, UI, permission features.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've used chrome as a browser for almost my entire life. It's kinda nice to still have the chrome i know and love, but with no google spyware.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

I didn't drink or have sex for a big proportion of my life (until 16). Was quite happy to ditch old habits.

The thing is, chrome was probably built for spying.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

When website doesn't work on Firefox.

Chrome in the next Internet Explorer.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pro tip: when a website doesn't work with Firefox, go download a user agent changer and switch it to chrome and watch the website work perfectly on Firefox lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh? Recommendations? I just said I'm waiting to get to the library to bid on a couple of municipal projects bc of this "must use chrome" nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

User-agent switcher is what I use. My only issue so far is that it messes up websites that use recaptcha or cloudflare "Are you a robot" challenges sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Thanks so much. I'll give it a try!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wait... You have encountered a website that doesn't work on Firefox? :/ Like finding a needle in haystack.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

It's not uncommon to see certain sites to only work on chromium because the dev used the filesystem APIs that don't exist on FF

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is more common than you think. It's usually not broken entirely, but firefox constantly breaks styling/css stuff on websites I use and build. I've had a few sites ask me to switch browsers because firefox doesn't support x y or z feature too

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This must be very specific and probably heavly bloated with unecessary stuff? (With probably alot of telemetry and other strange things...)

I have never encountered any breaking of styling/css, except with some specific addons (no-script, heavy dns blocking, ublock in hard mode...)

Not that I doub your claims, but if you have any example on hand I would be very open to give it a try and maybe learn something new in the web realm.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I remember trying to style a range input slider a few years ago and it worked everywhere except firefox. I also had problems with the style of the recently (inverted colors, wrong font). Not a big deal, I still drive firefox daily, but there are idiosyncrasies

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Discrepancies between the two systems doesn't mean there necessarily is a certain number of websites that the average user wouldnt be able to use in Firefox.

You are talking from the creator viewpoint not the end user, thats way different.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Never noticed an issue and if websites using only chrome supported features, it's an issue with the website, not the browser.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's one way to look at it. If a website works perfectly on chromium, but not firefox, why is this the website's fault?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Because in web development there are compatibility tables of what features work with which browser. If a developer has used a feature poorly supported, they either haven't done their homework, or intentionally made that call.

In web development, most reputable Front End Devs would not choose bleeding edge, barely supported features even if the temptation was there because the user comes first. Generally, you wait until it has been adopted by the main browsers (chrome, safari, ff).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Frankly, if something doesn't work in Firefox, thats like <5% market share. Probably lower for a lot of segments. I am familiar with webdev :) Let's not pretend most devs are checking caniuse for everything. Some sites leverage bleeding edge stuff that necessarily requires chrome, which is also fine. IRL people don't optimize for Firefox and that's usually okay, but sometimes there are quirks. That's all I'm saying

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeaaah i fking hate it "Please install google chrome to use this feature" nah, Imma skip it entirely

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was trying to bid on a couple of municipal projects recently, and got this. Nope. I'll go to the library, maybe.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm really curious if it's real or some bullshit. Do chromium based browser have something Firefox doesn't? I'm talking about all those "Please install Firefox to use X" because I doubt it

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They have tracking and zero privacy. Some websites wouldnt be profitable or worth it if they couldn't collect and sell data.

Google is a data broker.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, that's obvious, what I mean is if they have some kind of tools/functions that make it be able to do something others can't. The example that comes in mind is when I was checking a website someone suggested me https://my.rhinoshield.eu/ where it says "your browser isn't supported to do whatever it does, please install chrome"

Firefox

vs

Chromium based browser