this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
26 points (93.3% liked)

World News

38529 readers
2035 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/41400491

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

More rail infrastructure in Africa is great news!

For everyone commenting about debt traps, from an African perspective both Western debt and Chinese debt (or any type of debt) favor the creditors but Chinese loans are relatively advantages because

(1) they tend to focus on infrastructure that the respective countries can use to their advantage as opposed to the WB or IMF loans which promote neoliberalism that has never worked in Africa (or really any other place) and push Africa in a position to only be able to provide raw materials and never be able to switch to value added products.

(2) They push other richer countries interested in African to invest more if they want to compete with China. The US for example has made plans to invest in African infrastructure to compete with China:

https://www.usip.org/publications/2024/03/us-plans-build-africas-infrastructure-bring-opportunities-challenges

(3) If the debtor countries default on the loan or want to renegotiate, China (at least so far) doesn't use its intelligence agencies and military agencies to destabilize your country or force regime change

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Finally, a sane LW user. The amount of projection from westerners in this thread is ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They're not going to like it when China tells them it's payback time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt-trap_diplomacy

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

West: exploits countries, gives nothing back

China: exploits countries, gives public transport and jobs at high price

Western citizens: Hah! Look at those dumb countries!

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why don't you look into how much of Ethiopia's GDP goes to paying back China.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why don't you look into how much of Africa's resources exit the continent for Western use at a fraction of the actual price?

Who do you think put African countries in the precarious positions they are in where they feel nearly obliged to look at seemingly better deals?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ethiopia isn't giving over 10% of their GDP to Western countries.

I know, I know, "West bad, China good." Believe it or not, this isn't some sort of balancing act. Both the U.S. and China can have imperialist intentions in Africa. You don't have to defend one to condemn the other.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You didn't grasp what I wrote. Let me spell it out for you: Bad west make Africa poor. Poor Africa want better option. Poor Africa make better deal (still bad though) with bad China. Better not always mean good.

Do you understand now?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Okay. Sure. The better of two terrible options. Sort of like the least smelly turd.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Yep, but who's going to give them a better option? Western citizens would have to vote for governments that don't consider exploitation a "necessary evil" and for politicians that want enforcement of a fair trade supply chain. A prosperous Africa would mean more legal and most importantly highly skilled immigration.

But western citizens aren't willing to accept higher prices for goods as a result, so they don't vote that way. Instead it's easier to consume indiscriminately and whine when the people living in squalor dare look for a better life abroad.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks for the paywalled op ed.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Tanzania and Zambia about to join the "going to find out about Chinese colonialism the hard way" club. Corruption is cancer to any society.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Earlier this year, the World Bank approved US$270 million in financing to help improve connectivity between neighbours Tanzania and Zambia and boost regional trade.

I’d love for the west to say “fuck it let China foot the bill for everything going forward” and pull out leaving the 3rd world to be used and abused by them.

Chinese colonialism doesn’t get the press it deserves because no one cares about brown people being the victims. And China has zero fucks about human rights at home.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

The projection is crazy, China isn't Europe lmao