this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
28 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7186 readers
278 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Several million spread across a handful of projects may seem like small potatoes compared to other federal financing worth hundreds of millions, but Alex Cool-Fergus, Climate Action Network Canada’s national policy manager, is frustrated to see the federal government pump any money into the hydrogen sector. In an interview with Canada’s National Observer she called hydrogen an improbable “techno-fix” that has been effectively marketed by the fossil fuel industry.

The possible end uses for hydrogen are dwindling, which is eroding its forecasted demand. To put in perspective just how significant this is, four years ago Natural Resources Canada expected the global market could be worth up to $11.7 trillion, but now says it could be worth up to $1.9 trillion — an 84 per cent drop.

“It's disappointing to see that the federal government continues to invest in this false solution, and that disappointment is amplified by the fact that some of this money is going to massive companies that don't need any more money,” she said, calling it a “slap in the face.”

“If [fossil fuel companies are] going to be investing in this at all, they should be using their own profits.” Last year, Enbridge posted $5.8 billion in profit and greenlit $10 billion worth of new projects.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hydrogen is green snake oil.

Any production of hydrogen in bulk is made from petroleum

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Hydrogen was never anything more than a stopgap for people who were scared of charging for 20 min rather than spending 3 min filling it with fossil fuel.

I’m fortunate enough to have home charging and electric serves us just fine and has never let us down once. Road trips need a bit more planning but nothing significant and we only do those every few years so…

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

20 minutes if you have an electric car that takes that long AND you don't charge at home . The newer cars will be able to charge much faster soon enough, chargers permitting.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yup. The fossil fuel crowd sponsored by by oil always trotts out an edge case of someone who commutes daily 200 miles each way in the winter to scare people. But it’s a total BS scare tactic that probably impacts one person in a million.

The rest are better off on electric. Once they try they’ll never go back.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Giving these fucking whores more money is like feeding a crack-addict more Crack. You get nothing and they get what they want.

Fuck them, let them use some of the monopoly proceeds they've raped off forced victims to work out their own relevance.

They won't spend a dime of their own ill-gotten billions because they know hydrogen is pure bullshit and they can get fed money to conduct performative greenwashing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Corporate subsidies and payouts are one of the biggest problems in our society.