this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
306 points (99.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7211 readers
256 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fox News did not air a second of the speeches from alienated GOP leaders and former Trump officials who endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris at this week’s Democratic National Convention.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (8 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

A reminder that between now and November 6, everyone saying "Don't Vote for Kamala", is actually saying "Vote for Trump". Especially when they're saying it in the comments for an article about fascists being fascist.

There are only two candidates that we can vote for with a chance of winning this year. There are no serious third party candidates to campaign for. While I wish this wasn't the case, not "voting for the lesser evil" either means voting for the greater evil, or not voting at all.

If you actually want to avoid full-blown Fascism in America, stop fucking carrying water for Trump every chance you get.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yup, that makes perfect sense when you put it like that. This is precisely how Germany avoided fascism in 1930s, they just voted for the lesser evil and everything worked out great.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So what you're saying is that you know embarrassingly little about what happened in the March 1933 German federal election...

Spoiler: Hitler won because the fascists slaughtered their political enemies and seized power undemocratically.

If you think that you can avoid something like this by "not voting for the lesser evil", I don't know what to tell you. Until I have reason to believe that the election will be overthrown, I'll be cautiously looking for warning signs (there are some already), and I will vote for the party that isn't openly and proudly spewing Fascism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's funny how no matter how your sarcasm is interpreted, it's still factually wrong.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's funny how you expose yourself as being historically illiterate. German nazis never won more than 37% of the vote while there were still democratic elections in place. First chapter here discusses the rise of fascists in Italy and nazis in Germany. Let's take a look at what actually happened.

After World War I, Italy had settled into a pattern of parliamen­tary democracy. The low pay scales were improving, and the trains were already running on time. But the capitalist economy was in a postwar recession. Investments stagnated, heavy industry operated far below capacity, and corporate profits and agribusiness exports were declining.

To maintain profit levels, the large landowners and industrialists would have to slash wages and raise prices. The state in turn would have to provide them with massive subsidies and tax exemptions. To finance this corporate welfarism, the populace would have to be taxed more heavily, and social services and welfare expenditures would have to be drastically cut - measures that might sound familiar to us today. But the government was not completely free to pursue this course. By 1921 , many Italian workers and peasants were unionized and had their own political organizations. With demonstrations, strikes, boy­cotts, factory takeovers, and the forceable occupation of farmlands, they had won the right to organize, along with concessions in wages and work conditions.

To impose a full measure of austerity upon workers and peasants, the ruling economic interests would have to abolish the democratic rights that helped the masses defend their modest living standards. The solution was to smash their unions, political organizations, and civil liberties. Industrialists and big landowners wanted someone at the helm who could break the power of organized workers and farm laborers and impose a stern order on the masses. For this task Benito Mussolini, armed with his gangs of Blackshirts, seemed the likely candidate.

In 1922, the Federazione Industriale, composed of the leaders of industry, along with representatives from the banking and agribusi­ness associations, met with Mussolini to plan the "March on Rome," contributing 20 million lire to the undertaking. With the additional backing of Italy's top military officers and police chiefs, the fascist "revolution"- really a coup d'etat - took place.

In Germany, a similar pattern of complicity between fascists and capitalists emerged. German workers and farm laborers had won the right to unionize, the eight-hour day, and unemployment insurance. But to revive profit levels, heavy industry and big finance wanted wage cuts for their workers and massive state subsidies and tax cuts for themselves.

During the 1920s, the Nazi Sturmabteilung or SA, the brown­ shirted storm troopers, subsidized by business, were used mostly as an antilabor paramilitary force whose function was to terrorize workers and farm laborers. By 1930, most of the tycoons had con­cluded that the Weimar Republic no longer served their needs and was too accommodating to the working class. They greatly increased their subsidies to Hitler, propelling the Nazi party onto the national stage. Business tycoons supplied the Nazis with gener­ous funds for fleets of motor cars and loudspeakers to saturate the cities and villages of Germany, along with funds for Nazi party organizations, youth groups, and paramilitary forces. In the July 1932 campaign, Hitler had sufficient funds to fly to fifty cities in the last two weeks alone.

In that same campaign the Nazis received 37.3 percent of the vote, the highest they ever won in a democratic national election. They never had a majority of the people on their side. To the extent that they had any kind of reliable base, it generally was among the more affluent members of society. In addition, elements of the petty bour­geoisie and many lumpenproletariats served as strong-arm party thugs, organized into the SA storm troopers. But the great majority of the organized working class supported the Communists or Social Democrats to the very end.

In the December 1932 election, three candidates ran for president: the conservative incumbent Field Marshal von Hindenburg, the Nazi candidate Adolph Hitler, and the Communist party candidate Ernst Thaelmann. In his campaign, Thaelmann argued that a vote for Hindenburg amounted to a vote for Hitler and that Hitler would lead Germany into war. The bourgeois press, including the Social Democrats, denounced this view as "Moscow inspired." Hindenburg was re-elected while the Nazis dropped approximately two million votes in the Reichstag election as compared to their peak of over 13.7 million.

True to form, the Social Democrat leaders refused the Communist party's proposal to form an eleventh-hour coalition against Nazism. As in many other countries past and present, so in Germany, the Social Democrats would sooner ally themselves with the reactionary Right than make common cause with the Reds. Meanwhile a number of right-wing parties coalesced behind the Nazis and in January 1933, just weeks after the election, Hindenburg invited Hitler to become chancellor.

French liberals siding with NR against the NPF is a perfect modern example of history repeating as well.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago

This is an indictment, not something to be proud of

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Maybe i'm in the minority here, but inviting republicans from the bush years to speak at the DNC isn't actually that reassuring to me if I care about stopping genocide, or think that the US foreign policy as a whole is bad and wrong.

Hell I'd go so far as to say if you invite a ghoul like Mike Pence to speak at your convention, you obviously don't give a shit about LBG issues at all, and are only using them as a shied so that no one can criticize your absolute inaction over the past 50 years on all social issues.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (5 children)

The point being made with their appearance is that Trump is so toxic and repulsive that defectors are actively coming out of the woodwork to endorse Harris. It's meant to appeal to independents and Republicans who see modern Trump and are increasingly off-put by him.

Now, they are all aggressively repulsive pieces of shit, sure. But I think we all agree that Trump is an even more aggressive piece of shit in comparison.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Appealing to right wing voters by adopting their policies never works.

These ex-Republicans are not reaching other Republicans at the DNC. They are speaking to Democrats and selling them on their policies.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

They're not even ex-Republicans.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Participating in oppressor Olympics means you don't actually hold any values.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

The real world is nuanced and complicated sometimes. The enemy of my enemy is my friend works here.

We at least need to be welcoming and accepting of defectors until we've beaten trump and reinforced our democracy so a threat like trump can't happen again.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

Imagine getting paid to write articles like "right wing TV network hosts content favorable to right wing party candidates and not content unfavorable to them".

And then discovering that masses of people are both surprised and engaged.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›