this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Conservative

379 readers
2 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A significant portion of New York's electricity is produced by burning natural gas and fuel oil. There are multiple hidden costs that fossil fuel advocates don't want you to think about: https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/hidden-costs-fossil-fuels

One of the objections to reducing emissions in the US came in the question "why should we pay more for everything and reduce emissions when China and other developing countries do whatever they want?" I think this is a valid question, tho not a valid excuse to dump more CO2 into the atmosphere. But it makes me think of a similar question:

Why should the rest of us finance New York's cheap power at the expense of our environment?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Even if you thought that paying extra was worth saving the environment, the wind farm is making $54 per MWH in profit. A 30% profit margin with all those subsidies is obscene.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Now you speak directly to my socialist heart and I can not disagree.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As I have said, I am not a fan of wind. I prefer solar, nuclear, geothermal and solar.

Wind just seems like such a bad idea.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Offshore wind is especially bad because the turbines need a foundation that anchors the giant turbines to the ocean floor. Then there is the transmission line cost problem. Since Biden likes to sanction the planet, the parts to make turbines are more expensive. Nobody took the leases for offshore wind on the Greater Houston coast.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

I just see wind as not being that great compared to other technologies. Every time I’ve seen a field of them. Many are broken.