this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
41 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7124 readers
643 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

111-11-1111. 111-11-1112 too ez

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Again?

Numbers didn't change, no reason to reinvent the wheel.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The highest credit bureaus in the US have beaten them to the punch!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I think it was only one of them

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

That Mr. Burns "invincible" gag, except instead of diseases it's identity thieves crowding each other out.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I feel like we need more secure than a handful of numbers account for our entire life.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

eIDs are coming. Be careful what you wish for.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Social Security Numbers were never intended to be used the way they are. They were expressly for identifying you to the Feds for the purpose of SSI. Business just looked at that and said "hey, that's a good way to identify people" and ignored the feds when they asked politely for them to fucking not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yup, I get the history and Gov'ment went along withit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I mean, this is where a biometric identity authentication system would be beneficial, but like fucking hell if I trust any current entity, government or private, to run it securely for anyone's benefit and not sell the data to 3rd parties or keep it secure.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

aw hell yeah! I didn't need that anyway.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago