this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
42 points (100.0% liked)

US News

2004 readers
52 users here now

News from within the empire - From a leftist perspective

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On Thursday, Ohio’s Supreme Court ruled that the restaurant and its suppliers were not liable for Berkheimer’s injury, deciding that "boneless" referred to a cooking style

Writing for the Court majority, Justice Joseph T. Deters said, “A diner reading ‘boneless wings’ on a menu would no more believe that the restaurant was warranting the absence of bones in the items than believe that the items were made from chicken wings, just as a person eating ‘chicken fingers’ would know that he had not been served fingers.”

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

The west has fallen!!1!1!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is this an issue discussed by the SUPREME COURT?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The case was more about the liability of restaurants with damage their food causes and how food safety laws are applied. This is just the sensationalized headline.

Also each state has their own Supreme Court. This is not the Supreme Court you’re thinking about.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

This went to the freaking Ohio Supreme Court. Jesus.

My 2 cents, boneless is boneless. It is, and has always been, chicken breast meat for boneless wings. I have never expected deboned wings. Stupid case

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Can't have teeth in Ohio

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago

Every day I have to wake up and deal with the fact that this is considered a real country.