It push the lawmakers to better regulate.
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
20 points (95.5% liked)
Asklemmy
43746 readers
1310 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm sure they will, until they realize why it's a good idea to keep the humans.
I know AI isnt that reliable, but AI is for the creative people, what the machines were for the working class in thebeginning of the industrial revolution. It will not defeat them, but replace some. So fighting for the right to have a job is a good thing, and striking is an opportunity to show that they don't want to be replaced before its to late.
As a company won't that mean that I should invest more in AI to not suffer through strikes?
As a company owner you're certainly welcome to try - some have and it's resulted in some pretty massive lawsuits because it turns out that AI is neat but unreliable.
This is an excellent time to get union agreements in place to prevent investments to refine AI for certain fields.