this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
1034 points (96.8% liked)

Science Memes

10842 readers
2319 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Cross disciplinary skills for the win yo!

[–] [email protected] 56 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Same vibes as this video with Adam Savage. Apparently this piece of armour was a big mystery with tons of different drawings etc trying to place it as horse armour when Adam almost immediately correctly identifies it when first looking at it.

This is the power of diverse experience where experts can have a blind spot that's easily solved by others that have a different perspective.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Tldw crotch protector, and the historians did know that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 221 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Is there a source for these haughty, cackling archeologists making fun of hairdressers or is that just to manufacture some kind of underdog victory scenario?

[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 months ago

The latter. "everybody clapped" clickbait.

[–] [email protected] 106 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

That's really funny

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

Aren't weaves basically sewn in?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why werent they consulting hairdresser in the first place? They can't be experts because they're not academics? is that the reasoning?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (4 children)

It's made up, like facebook clickbait. Archeologists are not idiots.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Honestly I'm swallowing this wholesale if it happened until like the early 90s or something. Maybe even later. To think of roman hairdressing styles as entirely an archeological question and never one where you might ask a hairdresser seems pretty par for the course for academia

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

Haven't black women been doing this forever? My coworkers talk about sew-in weaves and shit all the time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That sounds incredibly tedious for anyone with hair shorter than "eligible to be donated to replace a horse tail"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I can't imagine a human being doing something tedious for style, I mean can you imagine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Ever time I see someone wearing their pants almost around their knees, I reminded myself about this fact.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You post this and let us wonder how this might actually work without any pictures of the replicas??? :O

ETA: here are some examples in the video, unfortunately not the one in the meme...

https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324900204578286272195339456

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 months ago

Some of the hairstyles by Janet Stevens.

There's a video that shows more, but there're advertisements and it's irritating.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is why you go to subject matter experts.

/Software development rant

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

/fucking everything rant. Scholars and management alike are terrible at this

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I've seen something like this referenced a couple times now, what is it?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Answering that question comes with a nobel price attached i presume.

What we know is this:

They are made during roman times, They are found wherever the roman empire stretched and there not considered very rare

Thats about it.

The notable theories are

  • as a weird currency

  • well known blacksmith “exam”

  • for knitting, apparently it has been demonstrated that you can use them to knit in practice but the art of knitting is thought to originate much later in history.

My money is now on wig building tools. As a spinoff to the common knitting one.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago (5 children)

My first reaction to seeing these objects was "they look like jointing frames for combining multiple rods". You'd feed long cylindrical rods into the holes, then use the little knobs to affix them, using them as anchor points for tying the rods into place with string/rope (presumably the rods would have grooves in them to take the rope). Maybe you could make a little tent in this manner, something light, perhaps a bug net for your bed, or something along those lines. Or maybe they were already describing atomic structures 🤓

Complete nonsense, of course. But that was just my first reaction!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

My personal theory - used as a quick method for evaluating the value of gold and silver coins.

Holes are for diameter, the bumps are used to estimate thickness.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_dodecahedron

Roman dodecahedra date from the 2nd to 4th centuries AD and their purpose remains unknown. They rarely show signs of wear, and do not have any inscribed numbers or letters.

Emphasis mine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is after step one, cut a hole in the box.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

And that's the way you do it!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'd trust a hairdresser when it comes to hair questions… EDIT: Turns out in real life, they did trust the hairdresser, the fact about sewing is true but the overall story is dramatized.

Bad at styling my long hair but I have definitely tried and from what I did in the few hair tutorials I followed, and from knitting, I absolutely believe that making these complicated, pretty, structured knots/loops was done by sewing.

[–] [email protected] 139 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I love this story because just imagine the setup.

All the top world archaeologists are in the biggest archaeology summit trying to figure this out. The queer son of the most famous archaeologist was visiting because his dad was trying to make him a real man and follow science instead of fashion. He takes a look at the poorly design slides being project and makes a snarky remark. "they're definitely sewed 💀😭💅". But everyone made fun of him so he took it personally. The next day he came back with an exact replica of the hair style sewed on his bestie's hair. In awe, everyone got up and clapped. The kid's name? Albert fucking Einstein.

[–] [email protected] 76 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Not sure whether you meant to express disbelief or just to be silly, but you did make me wonder if this meme was legit or not. It is!

[–] [email protected] 115 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but also:

And the journals quickly recognized her expertise.

So no crying historians in that story. She researched, proposed an article and the community said: "Good idea!" The whole "Oh, all those fine scientists laughed about the average joe/jane!" is just a common tale in those stories.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

It's a common conservative thing to own the libs.

Also wasn't so fast:

Through trial and error she found that she could achieve the hairstyle by sewing the braids and bits together, using a needle. She dug deeper into art and fashion history books, looking for references to stitching.

In 2005, she had a breakthrough. Studying translations of Roman literature, Ms. Stephens says, she realized the Latin term “acus” was probably being misunderstood in the context of hairdressing. Acus has several meanings including a “single-prong hairpin” or “needle and thread,” she says. Translators generally went with “hairpin.”

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago

Wow, that's some serious anthropology, that's awesome!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago

GLAM = Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

lmao I didn't get past the first sentence before I knew it was sewn/braided

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›