this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
1229 points (98.0% liked)

Memes

45679 readers
989 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
1229
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
(page 2) 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

"Forget everything you know about slipcovers!"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Imo university most important task is to teach you the basics and how to accumulate and use the knowledge you need to do a job.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Yeah, some of the computer science theory I learned occasionally comes in handy when I'm reasoning about problems or when I'm picking apart some spec. My husband who attended a code school instead is a perfectly apt developer, but he struggles more. College also just gave me the time and resources to get a survey of knowledge outside of formal coursework. On the job, I tend to go more in-depth on topics closely related to the job.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Don't think I've ever actually heard a company say "forget everything you learned in college".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

From what I understand it's fairly common in engineering, but less of a forget everything you learned and more of a that’s all gonna be pretty much useless in the context of the specific job you're doing so just pay attention to the training

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

I can recall employers saying something along the lines of "don't think you know everything about business because you just got a business degree" but that's mostly about the attitude some new grads have.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

because they don't

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 104 points 4 months ago (7 children)

The original idea behind school isn't to educate the masses. Why would a factory worker need to know calculus and Shakespeare? He needs to read the clock and timetables, be on time, wake up in the morning early enough to be punctual, ...

Likewise higher education isn't about the thinks you learn. It is about learning methods to learn. If you can learn the nitrogen cycle, you can learn our scrum statuses. If you can hand in your homework in time, you can keep our deadlines.

This isn't to say the system is good, but it helps to understand it when you want to criticize it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Ah, Elementary through Highschool teaches you to be an employee.

Higher education is being sold dreams and taking on debt to learn to be a better employee. Sounds about right.

I teach myself new complex skills all the time, but I imagine I'm still written off a ton because I didn't pay for at least the four year license to learn to learn. Lol

(I want to emphasize I'm being playfully sarcastic about our clown world society and not attacking you, you are very correct about needing to understand before one critiques!)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

A factory worker seems like one of those jobs that doesnt require a college degree.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I was talking about the origin of general schools in general

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I think in the context of the factory worker, they are talking about high school

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Cant you find out the answer for these questions with a series of short tests?

I once applied for a job at IBM and instead of an initial interview they sent me a series of interactive tests to check my skills. I ended up moving to another country and didn't follow through, but still liked this approach.

Also in the EU I can see lots of job listings are using now a system where you either have a certain type of education/degree or a certain previous experience to be eligible to apply.

Still you need to have knowledge of the specific field, but technically if you started at the bottom with an entry level low skill job you can get higher with experience alone and without a university degree.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

A college degree ahows you can complete a series of seemingly-unrelated tasks (courses) across multiple phases (semesters), to finish a major project (degree).

It means you finish what you start and have an eye on the future instead of the present.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

I've grown rather cynical of corp-speak lately, and I've heard this line before.

Whether said overtly or not, at least nowadays I'd be willing to bet a degree is used as a positive indicator that the candidate is likely in debt, will do anything for a job, and therefore will stick around and put up with almost anything for less wages, because they lack leverage.

They're therefore cheaper to hire than an independent individual that might exercise their freedom to leave if they're not treated with respect.

This might also explain why folks with high level degrees are constantly called "overqualified" and ghosted.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Your answer sounds like it was lifted from a LinkedIn motivational post.

College favours the rich, who can afford it and I don't think people with higher education are better at planning their future.

Lots of people are forced through college by their parents, often backed up with money and safety nets of security - if they fail the first time they just throw more money at it and try again.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It's definitely not a perfect system and you're absolutely right that it significantly favors people with strong support and safety nets, especially those of a financial nature.

That being said it's a very easy shorthand for a company to take and is reliable enough to keep using it, just like how financial institutions in the US use SSNs as private identifiers because it's easier and cheaper than running and supporting their own systems/assessments and mostly works well enough

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

A lack of a degree isn't proof of anything, good or bad (for most jobs).

But a degree is a positive indicator.

The reality is that when hiring an employee I don't care how privileged they are. I care about whether they're going to be a good fit for the position.

There are other things people can use to demonstrate their ability to be a good employee. If someone worked for a company for multiple years and was promoted during that time it's a good indicator.

If someone is 23 and has worked for 10 different companies, I'm gonna guess they're flaky.

However, if someone worked for the same company more than once that's a good sign, because after leaving the company wanted them back.

But, all else being equal, having a degree is better than not for a skilled position, and will usually demand more money.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Not everyone has the capacity to make it through college.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Can they? Yes. Absolutely. 100%.

A local factory likes people with college degrees, any degree, no matter what college or course, but also offer tests twice a year in large groups for exactly the reason that plenty y of people are qualified, and can do everything they need, but never went to college.

Will they? Probably not unless it's a niche employer. Why bother going through the extra effort when you can just say "degrees only" and turn your nose up at anyone without one?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I guess 5 rounds of 90 minutes long multi-stage interview process is much more efficient, where people selling an idealised version of themselves in imaginary scenarios.

Also talking to HR/recruitment department, who has no idea of the actual job is a great way to find the right candidate.

...its ridiculous

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

I hate interviews. I've been on both sides and neither is fun.

One person is pretending to be what they think the employer wants. The other is trying to figure out who's the least full of shit.

I just generally hate situations where everybody is expected to be fake, and not playing the "right character" will get you shunned.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 4 months ago (3 children)

But learning to critically question statements and judging them yourself (which requires some knowledge, for example you can't question anti-vaxxers when you don't know anything about how vaccines work) instead of simply believing them is extremely important in a democracy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

There’s ample evidence to show that no one learns critical thinking in college. At best, you select for people who are better at it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

I have watched YouTube videos of smart people reading a smart book that basically said that our education system has the focus on learning facts which gives us a submissive attitude. It gives us a feeling of passivity, of the silent observer.

That said, I realize that the system is getting better in the sense that it tries to evoke curiosity and makes kids to explorers instead of observers if that makes sense. Also, as someone who got interested in history only after school, I know that basic knowledge is important and bad if missing. Than again, why didn't school make me want to know stuff.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Judging sources for the information requires way less knowledge. To continue your analogy, for most people it's obvious to take your medical advice from your family doctor instead of that crazy aunt in Facebook

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Dont you think that answer is far to clear cut? How about if it's abstatement heard from a supposed friend's doctor and you dont want to get a hold of your family doctor for as inane of a question as it is?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

While you'd generally believe that to be true it can be hard for people with no knowledge who aren't the brightest to see through statements like "doctors just are part of the wealthy smart people society who aim to keep us down".

Never underestimate human stupidity.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The problem is when medicine is for profit, you really do end up with that feeling when doctors are rushed to get you out of the door because they need to see ten patients an hour. When you’re the product it’s harder to build that trust.

It was probably better before when family doctors actually had a relationship with your family.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 4 months ago

The same energy as "entry level job, 10 years of work experience needed".

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›