this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Economics

1695 readers
9 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Wankies having a meltdown and resorting to downvotes in these posts is just hilarious. They'll soon be pushing a "EVs are badfor the environment" narrative with cherry picked research, deflection and whataboutism.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

To celebrate Tesla’s US$788 billion market cap in comparison to BYD’s $93 billion is to confuse incentives with outcomes. Both companies receive generous tax breaks and other government goodies. That Tesla is far more profitable than BYD while EVs have far less market penetration in the US is evidence of policy failure, not Elon Musk’s brilliance. Tesla pocketed the incentives while BYD (and competitors) delivered outcomes.

That's one hell of a paragraph.

What we want from the butcher, the brewer and the baker are beef, beer and bread, not for them to be fabulously wealthy shop owners. What China wants from BYD and Jinko Solar (and the US from Tesla and First Solar) should be affordable EVs and solar panels, not trillion-dollar market-cap stocks. In fact, mega-cap valuations indicate that something has gone seriously awry. Do we really want tech billionaires or do we really want tech?

Very superb rhetoric.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Damn. Now I have to read the article. I feel those paragraphs in my bones.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

The business press has fallen into an at best lazy understanding of value creation.

This is much too generous a reading of The Economist’s purpose. The Economist, a journal that speaks for the British millionaires — Lenin, 1915