this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
743 points (93.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21607 readers
360 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
    [–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    that website is such a joke, I can't believe the guy's still paying for the domain name... The whole argument boils down to "Many flatpak apps don't make use of the sandbox by default, which is less secure than not having a sandbox at all" and "this one app I like doesn't work in flatpak, therefore all of it is bad".

    ...unless it literally is a joke and I'm just missing out on the sarcasm?

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Its only worse than not having it at all in the sense of giving users a false sense of security. Imagine if apps on mobile could decide what permissions they want automatically granted without the user opting in. The sandbox HAS to be enforced by default to be good. And the other issue with flatpak is the security, which we had several problems with in the past. On the same note, people criticise snap but its a much more competent solution from a technical standpoint regarding security and since people get all their apps from flathub anyways, the "propreitary" backend is mostly irrelevant. And before anyone says "snap store had malware hosted" that is not an issue with the format itself but the infrastructure.

    [–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Its only worse than not having it at all in the sense of giving users a false sense of security.

    Flathub's website has a bigass banner telling you if an app requires permissions that they consider dangerous. And flatpak's CLI tells you what permissions are needed when installing an app. It's pretty hard to miss, no?

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

    This is still not a reason to automatically grant them. This permission model is fundamentally flawed. Besides, the CLI doesn't even show these.

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

    Also. Maintaining snap packages are easier for developers, and companies, therefore they are more likely to distribute apps on Linux to begin with.

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    I've never used it. Its like all the others though and I have been forced to use snaps. Those I slowly replace every time I decide to start fresh.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Try linux mint, it's basically ubuntu but without snap (you can install snap if you want to, but it's not forced on you)

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

    Oh I have. I have it running on some older hardware.

    [–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    False, if it exists in the Linux ecosystem it also exists in AUR

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    The broader meta point is that X thing you want isn't the devs job, btw.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

    X thing you want isn’t the devs job

    Well, it is if they decide it is, and it isn't if they decide it isn't.

    That said, I do appreciate devs who put up native deb or rpm repos for the most common distros.

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago
    [–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Bottle's developers disagree with this meme

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    I cannot use bottles since months due to their faltpak monogamy policy :/

    [–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    ..explain? It literally has Flatpak as first-class support, i.e. it's guaranteed and only guaranteed to work on Flatpak

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Because I use it from the AUR...

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

    Try using the Flatpak

    load more comments
    view more: next ›