this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
1700 points (98.2% liked)

People Twitter

5182 readers
1892 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I could throw a site together if the community is willing to help curate the data.

From what I read here are some keys to follow:

Year Taught: Year of irrelevance: Country: Fact:

I could throw a form together for submissions to feed this site. Thoughts?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

You'd probably need to verify all submissions

Unless you throw an LLM into the mix

Or maybe there's already some resources giving you all debunked facts with their dates

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (3 children)

You believe an LLM can be used to distinguish facts from fiction? I wonder up to which year that misconception was taught in school.

The whole point of LLMs is, to convince their users that the "facts" they generate are actual facts.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I would probably start out by proofing or approving them before they post to the site. It say I get a notification read it do a little reading over it and get to a point where I can use a large language model to siphon the submissions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

For America, you'll also need to have a drop-down for states. I graduated from high school in California in 2009, and I'm currently working on a medical degree, so I'd be delighted to contribute to this. I'd especially like to help with a sex ed section for Americans.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I graduated from high school in California in 2009

Hey, me too

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I’m not sure I’d want to get that granular because of the same fact was taught across the country there’s no need for the redundancy. Also trying to make this a global website helps removing that level of granularity from the states as well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Design it so that it can get that granular later(when someone else wants to do that work)

As long as it's got the capability it can grow into that later. Assuming unexpected and explosive popularity/growth it would be great if wikifoundation acquired it someday as a dataset if nothing else, but having a structure that can be expanded globally at a granular scale baked into it from the beginning would be awesome

Sorry I'm not great with computers or i would offer more of a technical opinion not just design commentary

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 4 months ago (3 children)

"When and where did you graduate"

Texas: 2024

"... How can you even read this?"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I sent the Twitter image to chatgpt to convert the image to text and then I put that text into websim which generated a website that does exactly that and it even handles if you graduated recently and it will link you to a timeline of debunked "facts" here's the link, enjoy! https://websim.ai/c/GeEMLk9DuUC23jV9S

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Lemmy Kiss of Death? Or API rate limited or.. both 😅

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I think having something that gets vetted by experts would be better, but this might be a good starting point.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (7 children)

I got: "We only use 10% of our brains. Modern neuroimaging has shown that we use most of our brain." In the 90's I thought this was not in fact, but urban legend, the whole time.

Also: "Christopher Columbus discovered America. Indigenous peoples had been living in the Americas for thousands of years before Columbus arrived." I didn't realize that it was implied no one was here when he came.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

yeah the issue with "discovered" is cultural interpretation, not factual. If you assume that indigenous people don't count, or if non-aristocrats going there doesn't count as discovery, or if it was discovered by Asian peoples but not yet by Western peoples...

I dunno if a fact-checking website can get into it as it is figuratively and literally critical race theory (ooOOOOooOOOoh!) to have that discussion.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

yeah idk how good the website it made really is but it sure is interesting that it could just do that on the fly

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›