Privacy

829 readers

1 users here now

Privacy is the ability for an individual or group to seclude themselves or information about themselves, and thereby express themselves selectively.

Rules

Don't do unto others what you don't want done unto you.
No Porn, Gore, or NSFW content. Instant Ban.
No Spamming, Trolling or Unsolicited Ads. Instant Ban.
Stay on topic in a community. Please reach out to an admin to create a new community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

When your bank/CU/brokerage demands that you login to their portal to update KYC info - Hack Liberty (links.hackliberty.org)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(cross-posting is broken on links.hackliberty.org, so the following is manually copied from the original post)

When your bank/CU/brokerage demands that you login to their portal to update KYC info soloActivist to [email protected] ·

In the past I have only seen PayPal spontaneously demand at arbitrary/unexpected moments that I jump their their hoops -- to login and give them more info about me. I reluctantly did what they wanted, and they kept my account frozen and kept my money anyway.

So I’ve been boycotting PayPal ever since. Not worth it for to work hard to find out why they kept my account frozen and to work hard to twist their arm to so that I can give them my business.

Now an actual financial institution is trying something similar. They are not as hostile as PayPal was (they did not pre-emptively freeze my account until I dance for them), but they sent an email demanding that I login and update my employment information (even though it has not changed). Presumably they will eventually freeze my account if I do not dance for them to satisfy their spontaneous demand.

I just wonder how many FIs are pulling this shit. And what are people doing about it? Normally I would walk.. pull my money out and go elsewhere. But the FI that is pushing KYC harassment has a lot of power because they offer some features I need that I cannot get elsewhere, and I have some stocks through them, which makes it costly/non-trivial to bounce.

I feel like we should be keeping a public database on FIs who pull this shit, so new customers can be made aware of who to avoid.

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Here's the thing. It's every bank that is on the SWIFT network because the US is a terroristic state when it comes to financial spying, sorry "transparency".

Demanding KYC and reporting all your transactions via SARs is the standard thing for all banks. The only ones that get away with not having to do it are the manipulative criminals who schmooze there way in with tellers and do transactions that way. But that's also stopping with the crackdown at large.

I keep accounts in the US, but I have moved as much as I can out. If you're in the position where you've got high 5 figures or more it may be worth it to setup accounts outside the USA in countries that are hostile to the US banking system. If you are in the position where you can drop $250k on a new citizenship, then get it. Then open accounts under that passport in countries that don't comply with the US.

Otherwise, you're screwed. This is why crypto and BRICs are a big thing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Sounds mostly reasonable.. but I don’t see the alternate citizenship helping, unless you mean to go as far as renouncing because all FATCA regions (~130+ countries) look at the birthplace, not nationality, and you can never get a new birthplace. It’s probably hard to find a non-FATCA region where you can trust the banks. But indeed.. getting your 4th amendment rights has come to extremes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

AML and KYC are one set of requirements, and those are usually triggered by certain activities

Asking for employment information, and income information, is separate. That's the bank trying to manage their credit risk. So if they're extending you any credit that's relevant information they want to keep updated.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

That makes some sense.

In my case I think I have credit that I’ve never actually used; and I think I’ve also put on their file that I am unemployed. So in principle consumers who either don’t care for the credit, or are happy to be in the highest risk category, they should not be harassed with this. I will just ignore it and see what happens.