this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Privacy

1098 readers
1 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Those evil companies block random users, just because their government made some laws about it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

There is no matter a motivation of products that play against its users. For the business important only the fact the companies is not reliable.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Yeah, if your platform has opinions then you don't have actual free speech.

Email is free speech.

Mail is free speech.

Talking in a square is free speech.

Talking to friends Is free speech.

Anything where a third party can deny, edit, shadow ban, or delay is not free speech.

Twitter is not free speech

Facebook is not free speech

Whatsapp is not free speech

Newspaper opinion pieces are not free speech

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

With the exception of antiX.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

X? As in X11? Or X as in previously twitter? For the former, wayland exists and for the latter, the fediverse exists. Both, I wouldn't consider a security threat.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

antiX the Debian based Linux distribution.