this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
238 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37724 readers
445 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago

"Land of the Free" my ass

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

"Social media" is next and many people here already support it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

To be honest.. A lot of social media should actually be banned.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Yep, people sadly are bad at extrapolating how restrictions on something they dislike can be cross-applied to limit things they don't dislike, by others.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's basically the idea behind these laws.

Conservatives want to make porn illegal, which isn't easy under traditional means, so they're taking the "Putin" approach as I put it, make viewing porn hard, unattractive or even dangerous and make delivering porn to people hard, unattractive and dangerous.

Requiring an ID from the government to view porn means the government can tell who is watching what. If one of those people happens to run for office or get a little too campaigny, their porn history can be named and shamed.

And porn providers know this, and know that will drive people away from their sites, and on top of this implementing this will likely be bureaucratic and likely expensive, so they'll stop serving an area.

And when this is applied to non porn sites that have porn like Reddit or twitter or Tumblr, well guess what's going to happen, those sites will ban porn from their site.

It's basically banning porn by making it impossible to get porn in a way that doesn't end up with you getting blackmailed. Children have nothing to do with it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

*human porn.

Google can't even block yiff with safe search, lol. AI has incredible difficulty with evaluating furry porn. Which means that Mitch McConnell is going to live out his final days looking at anthropomorphic hyenas that could benchpress a fridge and have 11 inches of freedom, lmao.

Generations of southerners and people in the central US are going to be looking at considerable amounts of yiff if conservatives have their way.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I love the defiant cursed energy here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

It is...inevitable. A shame, really. >:)

load more comments
view more: next ›