Fisker? I thought that went out of business like a decade ago? Did it come back somehow to die again?
this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
1374 readers
243 users here now
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
[email protected]
[email protected]
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
They did and then Henrik started a new company named Fisker.
Seems like this guy doesn't have the best track record with starting car companies
He starts them just fine. After that, not so much.
These electric car companies are so blind to what people want. The market is already saturated with $80k+ gizmo-laden spy mobiles. Where are all the true economy electric cars in the US? Detractors point to these failures as "proof" that electric cars are doomed and nobody wants them, but it's just that nobody wants or can afford the crap they're throwing at us.
its a how many you can produce vs margins situation. not many companies want to take the risk on a high production low margin product, as failure would put you soo deep in the red that you wouldnt come out unless your first product knocks it out of the park.
its why moat. conpanies are doing the top down approach (e.g Tesla, Rivian) where you cater first to the high margin vehicles and then make your way down. given the sales of cars like the chevy bolt and nissan leaf, people are picky about cars they buy, and the problem new car companies have is the one that vinfast has, which is "would an average consumer buy a new cheap car, or a used premium car" and its usually the latter.
All these dumb companies chasing the wrong high margin class imo. Tesla did it right, start with the sports car: the EV powertrain plays well to its strengths, their big advantageous use case isn't 600 mile road trips, and they don't need to tow. Starting with the mom-mobiles and dad's pavement princess puts you on the worst footing by needing obnoxiously large amounts of the most expensive component, needing to meet road trip or towing standards, and catering to a market that by definition has other big spending priorities, e.g. their kids or whatever they want to tow. If Ford's first electric mustang had been a cobra equivalent rather than a sportier electric escape I suspect they would have had a much better time.