this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Interesting Global News

2583 readers
162 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

One critic described Alito's cavalier expression of his right-wing views as "deeply troubling" for the Supreme Court.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/CSrN6

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Project 2025 piece of shit is what he is.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Well that's terrifying. I'm starting to think you can't have a real democracy without strong recall abilities on politicians. The fact that these people are untouchable in office no matter what we find on them is insane.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Question is, how do you keep that from being abused?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Recall those that abuse it.

But we are lazy. So we wouldn't do that. So it would be abused.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Your face when you gave control of your society to a death panel of Dark Ages clerics who interpret doctrine into law.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I think this clown missed the class where US Constitution mentions "separation between Church & State".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

I really wish it did, but the constitution does not contain that phrase. It does contain "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" (the establishment clause) but "separation of church and state" comes from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Except the US constitution does not include that language. The "a wall of separation between church and state" phrase most notably comes from an 1802 letter by Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Association. Not a legally binding document by any means.

I imagine you're thinking of the Establishment Clause of the Constitution which forbids the US government restricting the free exercise of religion.

I believe, iirc, the Supreme Court over several decades has affirmed and reaffirmed the overall position that the US government must remain secular and not favor a particular religion. Which is effectively what you're getting at.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You are correct. Though the meaning behind the phrase remains true and biding precedent. If only precedents meant anything in today's court system. They reinterpret the Constitution on a daily basis to suite the billionaire needs whose paying them that day.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

No no, my Christian fan fiction says the Founders were really thinking about the Jesus when they were writing that part, so it cancels out.