this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
71 points (98.6% liked)

Games

16751 readers
537 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Wake me up when Alpha Centauri 2 drops.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

I honestly can't play civ anymore because the ai is completely braindead, so either you play in normal mode where there's no challenge, or you play in hard mode where the rampart cheating makes the game unimersive and grindy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I was just thinking about a Civ sequel this morning. I clearly willed this into existence, you're welcome. /s

I didn't play a lot of Civ after 2 until 6, where I played only a few games. I'm interested to see what they do with another one and if it can stuck me in.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I wonder what kind of changes they will make to this iteration. I know VI was a big change from V, but eventually I learned to enjoy the different mechanics and have a ton of hours logged.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Stupid question probably, but as someone who hasn't really gotten into V or VI yet and thought that at a cursory glance they seemed pretty similar - what kinds of big differences are there between them?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In 6 your buildings in cities are categorised into districts. The districts take up a hex on the grid and receive bonuses based on adjacent hexes. A large part of the game revolves around planning your districts in every city as once they are placed, they cannot be moved. This is a slightly different playstyle compared to 5 where only the city location itself matters.

Some other changes were around science, policies and eras. You unlock policy cards which you can swap out for different bonuses when needed instead of a constant effect. Policies are just as important as science this time around, and researching science and policies is boosted by actions in the game instead of only using Great scientists/writers. Every set amount of turns the world enters a different era, which also offers different policy cards for that period.

There are no (or few) multiplicative bonuses. Having more cities is always beneficial.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Civ6 has districts. Instead of having all of a city's buildings existing in the city center tile, the city builds specialty districts that occupy a hex near the city. For example, a science district placed near some mountains will house the city's library, university, and research lab.

I think the districts are a fun addition because it exposes a civ's infrastructure to attack. You can pilliage an opponent's districts to temporarily cripple them and you get some decent loot in the form of gold, science, culture, or faith.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My only request would be the same it's always been: harder difficulties make the NPCs play better instead of just giving them bonus resources so they have amazing starts you have to rush to overcome.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But that sounds haaaaard to design.....

Hey, maybe here's an actual good use for AI, study how lots of people play strategy games, and teach a model to play at varying skill levels.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

That's exactly what I was thinking. If they can teach an AI to play GO, Civilization should be easy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

I'm kind of hoping for some asynchronous multiplayer features; Age of Wonders does this with some jank, but I think there's room for a less jank / a more polished implementation.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I know lots of people didn't like Civ VI, but I still put more hours into that game than anything else in my Steam library apart from Civ V and Kerbal Space Program lol.

As long as they keep making them, I'll keep playing them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I have the opposite problem weirdly enough. I played a ton of Civ V, and have had a lukewarm aversion to Civ VI knowing it would be a huge time sink when I could be playing other games. Such as KSP. Which I also haven’t been playing for the same reason.

I’ve had it in my library from some bundle or sale for years now but it still feels like it’s much newer than it is to me. I’ve just played one or two games of V when I have to scratch that Civ itch.

There’s just too many games and too little time

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

'It's just one game of Civ Michael, how long could it take? 10 hours?'

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I am a lifelong fan and it was a great game. I’m looking forward to 7 and hope my old ass computer can run it lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago