this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024

76 points (97.5% liked)

World News

38978 readers

3009 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Emigration: The hidden catalyst behind the rise of the radical right in Europe’s depopulating regions (theconversation.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

"hidden"

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

This was a very informative article, but I have to admit I don't agree with it's framing of the problem.

No doubt, migration has enforced ethnocentric tendencies, and this is reflected in elections. Migration is a problem created by capitalism in a two ways.

People are fleeing their countries because of war, environmental catastrophies or to find a better job and life, among other reasons. Problems that have been created by capitalism.
The most popular receiving countries in europe are former colonialist powers, so good-old racism comes back to the picture since it was not really addressed in the first place. Also in these countries neoliberalism has hijacked governments through legal lobbying, so relevant policies are being implemented that favor of the rich, definitely not the people, even less immigrants.

Briefly I could say, capitalism has destroyed democracy, or at least any reminiscence of democracy that representative democracy had, so the road has been cleared for quite some time now, for neo-fascist tendencies to be represented in local and EU parliaments.

I think talking about migration without mentioning capitalism or neoliberalism, gives a distorted picture of what's been happening in Europe, during the last decades.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Both war and environmental catastrophes existed prior to capitalism...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Indeed as capitalism and democracy have risen, war deaths have dropped precipitously.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

There is also a large analysis around migration that plays various roles in this. Like they mention that services are unmaintainable with no immigration to those areas. But also, who is emmigrating to cities? People seeking higher education, often from more well off families, predominatly women. This leaves a lot of working class men, who is often the main target of the far right. In Sweden, about 25% of men vote for the far right. This is just one example, I imagine there can be a lot of related reasons to this emmigration observation.

[+] [email protected] -10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The most popular receiving countries in europe are former colonialist powers

Germany and Sweden received one of the highest refugee per Capita, were not part of the colonist movement. The Ottomans were colonizing the entirety of the current problematic areas where refugees are coming from (Syria, Libya, North Africa etc ..) yet, you're blaming the West?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Germany and Sweden ... were not part of the colonist movement

Was this a joke?

German colonial empire - wiki

Swedish overseas colonies - wiki

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's definitely accurate to say that they had very little colonial involvement compared to the big powers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

It’s definitely accurate to say that they had very little colonial involvement compared to the big powers.

I wonder how you could back this claim. Any link in mind?

Please take a look at the following articles and maps:

Map: European colonialism conquered every country in the world but these five

Analysis of Western European colonialism and colonization - wiki

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I wonder how you could back this claim. Any link in mind?

Sure man.

Compare for example the extent and duration of the Swedish and German colonies

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_overseas_colonies#/media/File:SwedishColonialEmpire(FIX).png Wtf is that even, you have to zoom in to properly see most of it lol

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_colonial_empire#/media/File:German_colonial.PNG

To the, what I called, big powers of colonization.

The Dutch While they're in terms of territory best comparable to Germany, they had their colonial possessions for several hundred years compared to the, not even, 40 years of German control.

For the others, it's not even close:

Always happy to help out!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Summing up the conversation that took place here before your comment, I'd say the following and copy-paste a couple of things.

Of course there have been different levels of colonization coming from Europe. But in some cases, saying for example Sweden has little colonial involvement is like saying Sweden was a little Nazi in WW2. Should we applaud Sweden then?

So, it is also important to be able to approach european colonialism as a whole, since it has the common ground that whites are superior to everybody else.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Completely forgotten that you wanted to talk about Sweden and Germany in particular, did you?

As to size comparisons, you could, for example, dunno, look at maps. Hint: Sweden's only notable colony has been Finland. Germany was a bigger player but came very late to the game.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I'll try replying differently.

Completely forgotten that you wanted to talk about Sweden and Germany in particular, did you?

Not at all. You maid a claim, I asked for links. Then I provided 2 that are in relation to the way I see meaningful approaching european colonialism, as a whole since the basis is the same: white supremacy.

As to size comparisons, you could, for example, dunno, look at maps.

There are many criteria on colonial varieties and impact, borders is just one of them. For many more, please see relevant link above (Analysis of Western European colonialism and colonization).

Sweden’s only notable colony has been Finland.

Because you say so? Also, this statement undervalues the many Swedish overseas colonies (see relevant link above - Swedish overseas colonies) as well as the swedish participation in slave trade, both legal and illegal. A couple of examples among many.

Germany was a bigger player but came very late to the game.

Germany was a big player, not a bigger player, since late 1800. (see relevant link above - German colonial empire)

several military and genocidal campaigns by the Germans

Also, you talk about big powers, big players, bigger players so vaguely that I find it hard to follow.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You maid a claim, I asked for links. Then I provided 2 that are in relation to the way I see meaningful approaching european colonialism,

Wasn't me who made that claim. You provided one link that showed Sweden's colonial empire, tiny in comparison to the big powers (UK, France, Spain, Portugal, Russia), and one to DDG.

There are many criteria on colonial varieties and impact, borders is just one of them.

You might have an argument with Belgium, there. Sweden, ehhh not really. Germany is a bit of a mixed bag, let's just say be sure to also ask Samoans. The Herero and Nama was a genocide, yes. Not something you could single Germany out for, though.

participation in slave trade, both legal and illegal

By that account Nigeria has been the primary colonial power. Or better put native-run empires in the rough area.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Wasn’t me who made that claim.

You are so right about that, my bad.

The Herero and Nama was a genocide, yes. Not something you could single Germany out for, though.

I don't have someone else in mind? Any relevant link? (Yep, I like links a lot) I only know of the Herero and Nama genocide that was waged by the German Empire.

For the rest you mention about Nigeria, and since the article posted here is about Europe, I will kinda stick to the point I mentioned previously: It is important to be able to approach european colonialism as a whole, since it has the common ground of white supremacy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Things like the trail of tears don't come to mind? The Native American genocide is generally quite well-known. But there's a thousand all over the place, random example Tasmania. If you now say "But that was the result of an uprising and a war, not premeditated as genocide": Same goes for the Herero and Nama one.

since it has the common ground of white supremacy.

It has the common ground in technological and military supremacy flanked by the native, European that is, population being really into the enlightenment, insisting that there be a distinction between power and justice, and the feudal powers that be then sought new people to oppress abroad, also due to a relative power stalemate among empires/alliances in Europe, everything that could be conquered at home already had been conquered. That's like multiple centuries summed up but it's the main forces. Scientific racism was invented to rationalise the whole endeavour to the less power-focussed but at its core it's plain ole feudal imperialism. Which is why the continent is so up in arms about Ukraine: Russia wants to re-start that shit, re-conquer some of its previously ill-gotten possessions. As if it didn't have plenty still.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Ah ok. I thought when you said

The Herero and Nama was a genocide, yes. Not something you could single Germany out for, though.

you meant that others where responsible for this genocide, not only the Germans.

It has the common ground in technological and military supremacy flanked by the native, European that is, population being really into the enlightenment,

Ouch. That's a colonial narrative. Scary.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

you meant that others where responsible for this genocide, not only the Germans.

Nope. I meant that Germany isn't the only country to have committed colonial genocides.

Ouch. That’s a colonial narrative. Scary.

That's a) out of context quoted like that and b) historically accurate. Colonial expansion pre-dates scientific racism. If you want earlier evil motives try Christian missionaries, universalist in their own twisted way. Though going back in history on that one I think we'd need to start with Charlemange and the christianisation-by-genocide of the Saxons.