this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
172 points (96.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43847 readers
675 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There was a finding that all males have microplastic particles in our testes.

It became a meme.

Everybody laughed.

New meme overtakes old meme.

We forget about our plastic testes and move on.

But, is there any issues going forward, that anyone is aware of?

(page 2) 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Preliminary testes have suggested it will be an issue, but we need another few rounds of testes to be sure.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There are microplastics in your testes perhaps. Not mine. I'm built different.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

Not mine. Mine so big, they got their own municipal recycling program.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

So this is where all those plastic babies in King Cakes are coming from..

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Well perhaps the microplastics will reduce the overall fertility rate of the human population at large. Perhaps life itself will get so difficult for the average person, they'll be discouraged from having babies, and perhaps only then will the worst effects of climate change will be narrowly averted...maybe.

One of the worst things you can do to the environment folks. Don't bear children. Don't invite another being into this madness and suffering.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I saw it articulated as "the greenest thing anyone can do is not have kids." Pretty cynical, but also true. Unfortunately, there tends to be a lot of overlap between truth and cynicism.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 5 months ago (7 children)

“Bad for the environment” means “Bad for us humans”, nature will take care of itself, just not in a human scale lifespan. So not populating because of the environment doesn’t make sense. Why have a better environment for humans if there are no humans? I’m not saying we don’t need to look after the environment, on the contrary, we need to better ourselves and the environment because otherwise we go extinct anyway.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (6 children)

One of the worst things you can do to the environment folks. Don't bear children. Don't invite another being into this madness and suffering.

As is continuing to live so why don't you follow through on that line of thought here

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Can something be done? Possibly, who knows?

Will something be done? I wouldn't hold my breath.

This isn't the only potentially human civilization-ending event I first heard about this past month, and that doesn't include climate change that we've known about for literally decades, which many of the major players involved including the USA and China still don't seem to care much about even now.

There is a saying: "put your money where your mouth is", meaning that if people want to truly "care" about something - e.g. to be Pro-Life - then we need to actually get up off the couch and do something about what we otherwise claim to but don't really care. For instance we could... I dunno, wear masks when we feel the slightest hint of a respiratory illness coming on - cheap, trivially easy, and can save literal lives. And not to trivialize this, some people truly do care - even as I type this I'm listening to a livestream talking about restoration taking much more effort but yielding much greater results than merely shaming people by pointing out something bad.

However, and a bit ironically, Big Tobacco and Big Oil and Big Sugar and Big Tech and Big Plastic etc. all do this, investing great efforts into stopping efforts to try to stop them. Without equal or greater efforts in opposition... well, like I said, I would not hold my breath.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

which many of the major players involved including the USA and China still don't seem to care much about even now.

thinking-about-it that so?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Experiments in rats have found that once plastic is introduced to their environment, their ability to reproduce declines drdmstically. Genitalia are smaller, slerm rates lower. And the effect compounds and grows generation after generation, getting worse and worse so long as plastic is consumed.

Studies have also shown that human fertility (regarding actual physical ability to reproduce, not the choice of whether to do so) has dropped dramatically genetation on generation since the rise of plastics

https://www.theguardian.com/wellness/2023/dec/19/chemicals-affecting-sperm-reproductive-health-infertility

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

once plastic is introduced to their environment, their ability to reproduce declines drdmstically.

Their ability to communicate goes down too, apparently 😆

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

We'll just have to chew more.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

It's irreversible at this point and nothing you can do except hope it won't affect your health.

It's only fair that it's happening to humans since we are destroying the planet.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

it's gonna keep looping through the foodchain until some microbe finally figures out an easy way to break them down... fun stuff.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Soon we will all be plastic. Its already in our food and water.

What i really think about is these are only the effects so far from the plastics that have started to break down from when plastics were created (smaller quantities). What happens when the plastics of today start to break down (larger quantities).

Kind of like the effects of oil (air pollution) being felt 30-50 years down the line.

[–] [email protected] 89 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Probably fertility. It's almost certain that the decreased average sperm count is related to microplastics. It's less clear if it's related to our elevated rate of prostate cancer, but I'm cool with blaming big oil for that, too.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Or the lack of exercise. Or the lack of zinc. Or the obesity epidemic.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Plastic babies with poseable figures; you'll be able to get them into any cool action pose for selfies!

[–] [email protected] 40 points 5 months ago

Think of the profits corporations will be able to make curing the impacts of this!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›