Hmph. Might explain why gunpowder prices and availability is poor right now. I can only find Accurate 2230 in 1# canisters instead of 8# jugs, and other powders just aren't available at all. Vihtavouri--made in Finland--seems to have the same issues. Primers are pretty easy to find now; they were out of stock everywhere for the first two years of the pandemic.
this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Ukraine
8247 readers
33 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW
Donate to support Ukraine's Defense
Donate to support Humanitarian Aid
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Gunpowder ? I'm a complete layman but wasn't gunpowder used in old guns that the user had to refill manually ? I understand it is sold in detail nowadays ? For what usage ?
Gunpowder is used in all ammunition. You're probably thinking of black powder, which was used with percussion caps, flintlocks, and matchlock rifles. But commercial ammunition, artillery shells, and even the big guns on naval vessel still use gunpowder.
But yes, you can still load your own ammunition. You generally have to buy the primer (you could make them, but lead styphnate is really dangerous to fuck around with; mercury (III) fulminate is even worse), but you can re-use the bass casings. You can mold your own bullets if you want to, and there are ways of swaging on a brass or copper jacket, but most people buy the projectiles. Then you buy the gunpowder, and combine them to get the desired chamber pressure and muzzle velocity to get the ballistic characteristics you want.
As for the why - Well, the excuse I tell myself is that, generally speaking, the components individually cost less than the complete ammunition will cost at retail. If you load 9mm ammunition, you might save $.01-.02/bullet, which really only matters at higher shooting volumes, but you have much more control over the exact ballistic characteristics. For rifle ammunition, the savings can be pretty significant. IIRC, cost for 6.5CM ammunition starts at about $1.25/bullet, but I can get brass for about $.20/ea, a primer for $.10, and appropriate powder for about $.15, and a Hornady ELD-M 147gr bullet for about $.50 (or a bit less); that saves me a minimum of $.35 each bullet.
(But really? I enjoy it.)
That's so cool, thanks for the primer (😉). I didn't know any of that !
For making your own ammo I think
This is possible ??!
Yeah, all you need is a scale, powder, shell casing and the bullet, and it's like building a Lego set.
It's a little more complicated than that, mostly because you don't have to worry about building a Lego set incorrectly and having it explosively deconstruct itself in your hands. :) But broadly, yeah, unless you get really deep into the weeks, like wildcat cartridges, or swaging your own bullets, it's pretty much assembling the 'right' components.
3 by 2 hours of electricity a day. we are back to the worst blackouts again here in Kyiv :/
Welp, looks like we'll just have to focus on the fun stuff... like railguns and plasma weapons. Hopefully we all live long enough to see the future sci-fi keeps telling us about...
Minus the dystopian part, preferably.
Best I can do is superstorms and a ten-foot ocean rise.
Been that way for a while, over the course of the war -- we had more shell-manufacturing capacity than filler capacity. We'd been shipping some of the shells we manufactured to be filled in Poland, as I recall, because they had some excess filler capacity.
The cynic in me says these articles are all about fear mongering to permanently increase spend baselines in the MIC. Another part of me is saying that the industrial shortcomings are great to highlight and beef up now to ensure a deterrence and capacity for any conflict where the US is obligated to participate in (such as Taiwan).
I mean, the article is from the Ukrainian military. I don't think that Ukraine cares much about whether-or-not the US has capacity to defend Taiwan. I think that the Ukrainian military cares a lot about whether there might be some additional, unknown delay in supply to Ukraine due to slowdowns in the production pipeline. Like, they had the EU promise artillery shells by a date, and they got delays and got half that much at the expected date. I'm pretty sure that they had plans predicated on getting that ammunition, had set burn rates, etc. Then there was the fight in Congress in the US over aid supply that caused a delay. I bet that they don't want more of those. If I were gonna guess, they're aiming to look ahead and say "what might become a delay" and then highlight that as soon as possible to people who might iron it out. The guy from the US says "there might be a month or two delay due to obtaining filler", they want that to be minimized and have a cap put on it.