this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
286 points (89.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

9804 readers
10 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Like smart phones have now bounced to getting larger again, cars used to be big and got smaller because of Korea and gas prices. But then they are getting bigger again because of regulations and showing off.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 5 months ago (12 children)

The Chevy Suburban is about the same weight now as in 1973 (5837lbs then, 5785-5993lbs now, according to Wikipedia).

It was huge then, it's huge now.

The BMWs pictured are not the same class of car either


one is a coupe/sedan, one's an SUV, so of course they will be radically different.

Don't get m wrong, I think modern cars are too big and, in the case of BMW, way uglier than they used to be.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (9 children)

Exactly. This pic is comparing apples with oranges to get a rise out of us. There are irrefutable arguments for saving the planet, we don't need this low IQ rage bait.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The old BMW looks so much better too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

cellphones have been reversing the trend, we’ve gone back to phablet sized devices (but this time removing the smaller options)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (7 children)

It's bigger. Does that mean it burns more fuel or has more emissions than a 40 year old car? I'm all for saving the planet, but I'm not sure big automatically means worse. I could be wrong.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Bigger does almost always mean more emissions/worse economy for a given technology. In this case someone else pointed out that the economy is about the same for both, which is due to the fact that technology has improved; if you put the engineering effort of the big car into the form factor of the little car, it'd be much more efficient.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

They’re bigger specifically so they can qualify as “light trucks” instead of regular vehicles, which means they have more more lax emissions standards.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

means it’s easier to claim you didn’t see the kid you just ran over

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It weighs more and definitely could use a lot less space on the road and costume less fuel if it didn't grow to this size but stayed small and with less weight

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

BMW does offer small models tho. This pic is comparing apples with oranges.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

the 1984 BMW 318i gets 24 mpg the 2024 BMW x7 gets 24 mpg

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thank you for sharing actual data 🤝

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

i was guessing the actual models pictured, anyone know better?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They are still gonna be less effecient than smaller, lighter models with modern technology.

Another factor is bigger vehicles are deadlier.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

I replaced my old Ford Focus stationwagon with a Nissan Qashqai, an SUV. It has much better milage so it'll probably have less emissions.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›