this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
38 points (100.0% liked)

Environment

3923 readers
2 users here now

Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).

See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's not all wine and roses in terms of requiring sustained fracking, which defeats the purpose of transitioning away from fossil fuels, but the estimate is there's enough lithium (as lithium carbonate) coming from these sites to cover 40% of domestic demand.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Lithium isn't clean. Its not at all necessary .

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Several ecological studies and recent meta-analysis have suggested an inverse association between lithium in water and suicide in the general population, with a lack of knowledge of clinically significant side effects.

That last part though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

There's a couple ways to read that, one being 'at dosages which have been shown not to cause clinically significant side effects'. The other interpretations are more concerning, of course.

I vaguely remember reading that lithium in low doses has huge benefits with minimal to no side effects, but it's generally not taken due to stigmatization from the downsides of people being forced to take way too much for mental illnesses in the past.