They also contract a company that trains facial recognition AI on social media. I think the Real ID is the least if most people's worries
this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
184 points (95.1% liked)
Privacy
31108 readers
439 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
This is especially concerning given that citizens […]
Not everyone with a US driver’s license is a US citizen.
Correct, however this issue primary affects US citizens, given that driver's licenses aren't the only ID the DMV takes pictures for (e.g. the aforementioned Real ID)
load more comments
(1 replies)
9/11 enabled so much of this to be fast-tracked. Thanks, Patriot Act.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Every DMV photo in the United States is being used for AI facial recognition
I'm glad I don't have a US driving license then.
in the next few years Copilot will simply become a part of people’s lives
Only those who don't care about privacy and use Windows.
Only those who don't care about privacy and use Windows.
So most people, then.
load more comments
(3 replies)
I see no issue with the government using photo ID pictures this way, just as long as they aren't using third parties to handle the technical aspect of it or allowing any of the data to be handled by any third parties (eg private corps). They would be stupid to ignore that large amount of known good data they could train their facial rec models on. Yes it sounds big and evil but that's the world we live in as long as this technology exists and you want to participate in society, I guess.
They're collecting the data already, it's being used this way already by everyone else, so why not?
Look up the IRS's ID.me verification. That's a nasty 3rd party IMO.
Many people's threat models, like my own, are against mass surveillance. This falls under that category, even if it's being handled responsibly. The issue is people have no way to opt out, and there is a lack of transparency about the use of facial recognition.
You can be against it all you want but that doesn't mean it's going to matter IRL. The state of the world is that anyone with a large amount of data like this is using it to build models so they can profit and/or enforce. Even if they say they're not doing it, they're still doing it. Or someone with access to that data is doing it.
Crying about the feds/DMV doing facial rec training is low hanging fruit. Obviously they're going to be doing it along with every other government on the planet with the resources to do it. TBH there's nothing inherently malicious about it, since them having the data they're using is part of you having citizenship/identification in that country. The real malicious ones are the corporations contracted by said government to do the exact same thing except they're doing their own data collection through huge networks of privately owned security cameras.
The only way to avoid this is to go live in the woods and never come out. Any show of transparency or opting out of any of this would just be theater for you. It's being done, has been done, and will be done without your consent or knowledge.
Just because mass surveillance is already happening doesn't mean we should accept it as our only option. While it's true that governments and corporations are collecting data on us, there is still merit in pushing back against these practices. The point of privacy is not to hide everything and live in the woods, the point of privacy is to have control over what data you share, when you share it, and with whom you share it with. The problem isn't facial recognition itself, the problem is living in the woods shouldn't be the only way to avoid it. We should be able to opt out. What may seem fine to you is not always fine with others. That's why threat models exist, after all.
This attitude is what lets the government and big tech get away with so much bullshit.
“Well it’s happening already so crying about it isn’t going to change anything because you know that protest has never ever been effective even once ever and I kinda like the taste of boot anyways so what’s the big deal?”
load more comments
(5 replies)