I guess they'll just have to do research on the internet now, good thing there's no pornography on the internet
this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Interesting Global News
2421 readers
212 users here now
What is global news?
Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media posts
Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
- [email protected] - International and local legal news.
- [email protected] - Technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
- [email protected] - Interesting articles, projects, and research that doesn't fit the definition of news.
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
So, because there would be no minors present, libraries could reasonably start stocking pornography and serving liquor? I'm not saying I want that, kids should be allowed to learn, but it would be a very, very interesting establishment.
Fuck yeah!
Entering force on July 1, 2024, HB 710 features a definition of obscene materials for minors that critics believe to be broad and, per the library, “ambiguous.”
“‘Sexual conduct’ means any act of masturbation, homosexuality, sexual intercourse, or physical contact with a person’s clothed or unclothed genitals, pubic area, buttocks or, if such person be a female, the breast,” reads a portion of the bill. The law provides for broad assumptions regarding material that is potentially “obscene” or “harmful to minors” for simply dealing with the subject matter of sexuality or the human body’s biological reproductive functions. Parents or guardians can arbitrarily apply these definitions against libraries accused of “promoting” material that is supposedly harmful to minors. In the law, “promoting” refers to virtually any act of selling, loaning out, and distributing books, DVDs, CDs, or other media types. The law also prohibits live performances that meet the definition of being harmful to minors. It is pretty encompassing.
Judging by this definition, the Bible should unequivocally be considered harmful to minors. There's some pretty outright horny stuff in there. I'd say this should be challenged by using it to sue church libraries, but it looks like the bill is directed at schools and public libraries, so I'm guessing they're exempt by being private organizations.
It was banned in a different state, because it definitely qualifies under these definitions Utah primary schools ban Bible for 'vulgarity and violence', but then they had to reverse it because angered religious extremists Utah district returns Bible to school libraries after reversal of parent-led ban.
Thanks for the links! Of course they unbanned it, but it's at least good to see there are parents/citizens calling out the hypocrisy in the first place. I know they're fighting an extremely uphill battle in red states.
I get it, but this just hurts kids, not the fascists it needs to hurt.
I initially thought this was just a way of protesting the law, but looking at how it was written, I think this was literally their only legal option. I'm not sure how any library can stay open with the laws as written. I don't think schools can have basically any books, either.
There is no restriction on books that will hurt these people, just as there is no restriction on flying helicopters that hurts me. I am unable to fly helicopters and have little interest in learning.
Maybe. If the books are still available then it leaves the opportunity for parents/guardians to get the books for their kids. Which does still suck because I remember going through the library and grabbing every book I wanted. That certainly has contributed to my lifelong love of reading
Still, parents take their kids to library most of the time anyway, so kids can still get the books. Possibly this motivates parents to get more books for their kids to stick it to the GOP. I see this as a viable work around personally
Republicans banning books hurts kids, with a long term plan of getting even worse.
This is a short term minor 'hurt' with a goal of avoiding that long term harm.
Educated kids grow up to vote democrat.
That’s what this is about.