Just 9 days ago you posted about how corporations are creating a housing crisis and now you're posting about how people affected by the housing crisis should be sent to jail. I don't understand your stance.
this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Conservative
379 readers
2 users here now
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Strictly speaking, you dont need to agree with the articles, just want to talk about them.
Wouldn't it violate the rules of this community if a conservative doesn't agree with the article being posted?
Conservatives are not a monolith. Theres libertarians, the religious guys, corporate dudes, gun owners, cyber privacy/open source guys, TERFs, even people who dont really care much for politics but lean right anyways. Being cheeky, conservatives are diverse in thought.
So long as the post is conservative in some way, its generally good to go. (And not instance rule breaking too, but that goes without saying)
I am not the author of the articles. I hope that clears up the confusion
You're trying to paint a narrative with the articles you post.
You are the author of this comment
SFH are homes for people to live in, raise their families, etc. They are not investments. The large majority of homes should be priced where the average person can buy one.
So I'm still confused. From this comment I'd assume you'd be against people being sent to jail for living in a home they are raising their family in because someone else wants to use it as an investment.
I never made a statement. I posted content for discussion.
So you don't agree with this law change?
I am stating my opinion one way or the other. I post articles for discussion.
I'm trying to have a discussion. What do you think about this law change? I personally believe it makes no sense. Why would the government pay to put people in jail instead of ensure they have access to affordable housing?
They should hitch hike to NH... You can gain ownership of an abode from squatting.
But New Hampshire is full of damn yankees!
Imagine if instead of spending a fortune incarcerating people we use it to make it so people didn't have to resort to this kind of desperation.
I'm sure that we can arrest our way out of homelessness though! We just haven't tried hard enough.
@LookBehindYouNowAndThen @wintermute_oregon Homelessness is a complex issue caused by economic issues, broken homes, drug use, etc.
Simplistic solutions probably won't be able to resolve a problem with complex.
A simplistic solution is having people live on the streets. That's what we already do.
I really have no idea why you thought to verbalize that.
@LookBehindYouNowAndThen That's not a solution at all, that's a symptom of the problem.
Root causes are what gets people into that situation, as I've mentioned above.
Cool. Glad you contributed that. I had no idea that people had reasons for being homeless.
@LookBehindYouNowAndThen You're welcome! ☺️ It's always something to consider when people say "just give the homeless money!" or "just give the homeless people houses!"
I'd love if you point out where I said that.
@LookBehindYouNowAndThen I got the impression that you meant something along those lines when you said:
> make it so people didn’t have to resort to this kind of desperation.
Did you mean something different?
I meant exactly what I said.
You can always go back and reread it if you're confused.
@LookBehindYouNowAndThen I'm not confused at all. Are you confused?
Then I assume the only ways you can think the government can spend money is either giving it directly or arresting people.
What was that about simplistic solutions again?
@LookBehindYouNowAndThen That's generally what people who say things like that mean, yes. Thus my complaint about simplistic solutions.
Did you have a different proposal?
How about getting people the help they need to deal with those issues that you mentioned instead of throwing them in a cage and making it harder for them to be a productive member of society?
@LookBehindYouNowAndThen @realcaseyrollins
People who are broken do not change.
Welcome to Lemmy, new account!
They're also a white supremicist who wrote an article on their site called Whites Going Their Own Way. (Use archive.org if you dive in yourself so that you're not giving them ad revenue.)
Shocking that they've found a home in this community.
Thanks for sharing.
For those that don't know, Voyager (a great Lemmy client), gives a special icon for new users under 30 day, with a day counter.
It's useful to identify brand new accounts.
More often then not, they are disingenuous.
For those that don't use Voyager, it is helpful to comment identifying them as such, so others are more wary.
Have a great day!
@amerika @LookBehindYouNowAndThen They never ever change? There's no way that's true.
I just shared a post with an IRL friend about a dude who was homeless and on #heroin and once he got clean, he got a #ComputerScience degree with a 4.0 GPA.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7170893355210489857/
@realcaseyrollins @LookBehindYouNowAndThen
Anecdotal evidence is dubious, and you probably want to follow over time.
Then there is the question: was he broken, or just having a bad time in the short term?
@amerika @LookBehindYouNowAndThen I remember watching #KattWilliams' appearance on #BillMaher's podcast #ClubRandom, where he talked about the time when he was homeless, and how almost all the other homeless people around him were basically normal people who got hooked in drugs and lost everything. This convinced him to not do drugs.
Maybe this dude was such a man.
@realcaseyrollins @LookBehindYouNowAndThen
That must have been quite a shock, but it's not against conventional wisdom.
People on addictive drugs have their lives collapse and end up living under a bridge.
This is why we used to call the homeless "winos," because they were basically sad broken alcoholics.
@LookBehindYouNowAndThen Like rehab, job training, or mental health services for the homeless? I could definitely get on board with something like that.