this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
-1 points (0.0% liked)

World News

32285 readers
531 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

Who would've known, the man that made it so people can get their salary in jugs of milk is a complete idiot.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ffs stop trying to spread hate on this guy, at least try harder, biased articles and no context titles are not helping your dumb agenda either

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He genuinelly is not a good person. He's a glorified US fanboy anti lgbtq+ "anarcho capitalist." He also is against abortion. Where is this hopeful wiggleroom you have?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Idgf he's a good person or not, he's supposed to rule a country and stabilize the economy for the argentinian people. Since he's not aligned with the popular party of the Internet he's getting so much hate and from people that haven't even been to south America.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't think people on Lemmy like Peronistas very much, but the vast majority of things Milei stands for and has proposed are very sus at the very best.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

Oh please, if we go by Lemmy's standard, they would gobble Peron's cock

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Totally out of context title

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I am not surprised that Lemmy is a cesspool of leftism

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

Ah yes democracy

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Look, theres a lot of reasons this guy sucks.

Increasing the costs of two things that are causing the most damange to our planet is not a reason to criticize him tho.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

This guy isn't a climate activist. It's funny to see the price of fuel going up with a climate denier.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

sure it is. removing subsidies on commodities like gas doesn't change the demand for gas, it just puts more of a burden on poor people, and doesn't matter at all to the rich who use it most. that path will only lead to backlash against green policies in general, see the yellow vest protests. in order to reduce consumption you actually need to reduce demand by giving people sustainable alternatives.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

How the fuck do they afford subsidies? Why do you think they have been in this crisis for 30 years? It is a well educated and fairly modern society. But if you think socialist programs can be paid by borrowing money or printing money indefinitely and won't result in cronic poor outcomes then you have little understanding of basic economics.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Who could've guessed that a rightwing government wouldn't solve their issues (which were originally caused by rightwing policies)?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

which were originally caused by rightwing policies

Such as...

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

The implosion of Argentina is a very complex issue, but, essentially, the country allowed itself to be informally dollarized and ceded control over most of its industries to international (read corporativist) interests. When Perón restructured the country, it was done with a limited scope and with relatively short term changes, causing their economy to collapse again later (it doesn't help that Brazil, a powerful potential ally, had undergone a rightwing U.S.-backed coup at the time). Then, the whole Falklands/Malvinas war happened, all rightwing bullshit, and the country still hasn't bounced back.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Makes sense, if stuff is subsidized, the government has to pay for it. If the government doesn't have money to pay for it, they'll just print it out of thin air, devaluing the currency (and thus taxing the working class).

There's gonna be a lot of pain for Argentinians in the months and years to come, hopefully it'll all be worth it...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Austerity measures and privatization are basically never worth it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

No, you're right, let's better keep our ruler class' pockets full. That won't bite us in the ass.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

Then tax or seize their wealth. The loss of subsidies will specifically hurt the poorer much harder than the wealthy. The wealthy will just push their increased burden from loss of subsidies off onto the poor like they always do.