Be me
Discover linux in an effort to be able to customize your desktop and make it look like the haxxors in movies at 12 years old
?????
Woops ... Linuxed too hard and became a cloud infrastructure engineer.
FUCK!
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
sudo
in Windows.Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Be me
Discover linux in an effort to be able to customize your desktop and make it look like the haxxors in movies at 12 years old
?????
Woops ... Linuxed too hard and became a cloud infrastructure engineer.
FUCK!
Wiggly windows in compiz probably converted like 10 thousand 12 year olds to linux… I know from experience!
Yep. Same here :)
I look at this meme and lift my hand gently from the track-pad revealing the uncanny logo, ThinkPad and I think: Yes, this meme is for me.
Well, if it's good enough for the ISS, it's good enough for me.
now I gotta become an astronaut and be the first to install gentoo in space
You hear a knock on the window of the ISS, you look over and see an alien in a spacesuit floating, it holds a piece of space paper against the window that says "I use arch btw".
My GF is still using my 13 year old laptop running Pop_OS to do what most normal people do.
Watch youtube.
Now my current laptop is suffering my linux workflow abuse.
I fully support Linux and FOSS but, who the fuck pays for windows (not talking about pre installed computers).
I think the point is you can put a fully updated new Linux on a decade old ThinkPad but with windows you'd need to buy a whole new laptop to run modern stuff also it would be unusably slow
Just pay 10$ and you don't have to dread updates
The watermark annoys me so I grab one of those £20 fell of the back of a truck keys.
There's a github script to activate Windows for free
You mean slmgr or something 3rd party?
third party. Mas
I mean you pay for Windows on preinstalled computers, too. There are Laptops sold without OS and they are cheaper than the same model with windows installed.
Yeah, that’s why I mentioned preinstall, as in who would pay for one if they are not forced to?
I get what you mean. I just cant wrap my head around how many people buy windows without even realizing it and think they get it for free or some stuff
I’ve seen people pay for office, usually it was less tech savvy people that had enough money and thought pirating is in fact stealing.
It's not about paying for Windows, usually it's included in the device you buy. The real reason why Linux helps broke people is because bloated Windows can't run on the budget PCs they have (and they can't just buy a faster computer)
I did once. I built a pc. I hated the watermark. Y’all hadn’t enlightened me yet
I'll just use my steam deck for writing code. Thanks though, boss.
I used a Chromebook as my daily driver for years. It had a celeron and 4gb of ram. I ran galliumos for awhile then switched to Ubuntu because it seemed to work the best on there. It had great battery life, I'd get around 6-7 hours just doing web browsing and terminals.
You forgot paranoid people. I fall into all three categories.
Thank you Windows for making your latest version so shitty that I feel comfortable running Linux on all my hardware.
If the latest version is this shitty then I only expect the previous one to be enshittified up to the point of support drop.
Linux FTW!
can't fix whats broken by design
All they had to do was to allow me to move the taskbar to the side and I'm only partially joking.
I'd say all they had to do is remove mandatory Microsoft accounts but the road windows is going down just makes me think it was just a matter of time.
Linux all the way, comrades!
Why are you marking all your comments with "anti commercial ai license"? Are you licensing them so you can fight a court war if your comments get used for AI training?
It's idealistic, but may turn into action someday if did happen. If others participated in licensing their comments, it could even lead to a class action lawsuit, which could discourage commercial AI vendors even more and embolden opensource AI vendors.
I can recommend running it on new hardware. I love that it runs great on old hardware, but it is a bit of a disservice to Linux distros that people always experience it on raspberry pies and other old laptops or otherwise relatively slow hardware.
Linux on a brand new hardware is insanely good.
Edit: software => hardware
I'm actually a little scared of running Linux on modern, fast hardware.
How is multi-GPU driver support?
My main machine is a 900 TFlops compute monster (4 GPUs) running ROCM on Windows, and the last time I'd tried Manjaro on Desktop, it seized up for unknown reasons.
I've got asynchronous monitors - 1440p@165Hz main display and 4K@85Hz flipped vertical for a side monitor. Occasionally, I plug in a projector which is 1080p, mirrored to the 4K, but flipped horizontal.
I'm not sure what I'd done wrong because it works perfectly on my 11 year old Z575 (Debian+KDE there).
What distro would you recommend for an extremely fast/high RAM machine? I've got 128GB of main system memory, and 4TB of M.2 for a system disk running at 7.6 gigabytes/second actual/real-world RW I/O.
well ROCM is supported in Linux https://rocm.docs.amd.com/projects/install-on-linux/en/latest/
I've installed it on my (single) AMD GPU (I thought it was for something else) on EndeavourOS (which is, obvs, arch btw :D).
I've been using endeavourOS for about 1y now, after a few years of Mint (and 20years of everything else. Yes, I've used gentoo as well back when it was only install from stage1). It does feel faster (on the same hw) but I've never done any real benchmarking, so it could be just "new shiny feeling faster". I've found an article a few weeks ago comparing boot/compression speeds of different distros. In your particular case I wouldn't be using Debian as I feel you'd need quite up-to-date drivers, and Debian is conservative (and that's a good thing personally, I use it on my servers).
I see what you're saying, but I also think it's actually a mark in Linux' favor that is continues to run so well on older or underpowered hardware. It's how I really got into it, being broke and able to eke out years more life on older computers when I could ill afford upgrades. These days, I'm happy that I can get off the upgrade treadmill for longer. The most demanding games I've installed are the Final Fantasy I-VI Pixel Remasters and Grandia. I'm not a programmer, don't have to render graphical stuff for work, etc, so it's pretty great that I don't have to worry about my budget desktop being unusable in 4 years because the OS devs have made it a practical impossibility to run on older hardware. I've got 32GB of RAM, and my biggest threat to usability is leaving Firefox running with a ton of open tabs for weeks on end, which can conveniently be solved by closing Firefox and watching my RAM use plummet.
Not everyone is going to be a gamer, graphics designer or programmer that really needs the latest and greatest in hardware. In fact, I'd wager the majority of people won't notice an improvement outside of a few cases. Upgrading from an HDD to an SSD, <16GB of RAM to >16GB of RAM and from an older graphics card to a newer one that supports 4K are pretty easy differences to note in normal use. Those aside, I think most people would be hard-pressed to identify an objective difference in the quality of their browsing and word processing experiences. Depending on how flexible people are with adapting to different workflows, even those could be minimized, to an extent. I have a desktop I bought second hand twenty years ago that served as my main computer into and beyond my initial forays in university. It has a whopping two cores, and I think I might have managed to get 16GB of RAM into it. It'd probably suck for web browsing and wouldn't be terribly efficient for power use, but I bet you if I reinstalled things, it would work just fine for serving up my music library via mpd, playing it with ncmpcpp and writing term papers in Auctex, same as it did back then. Even if I put an older version of Windows on it like Windows 7, I bet it would struggle to run those same programs on top of the base OS. That's legitimately impressive, when you think about it.
Ehhhhhh I wouldn't say brand new hardware. A lot of times Linux still needs a few months to properly support a new Gen of graphics cards or processors
Though it generally at least works which is a huge improvement over back in the day
My primary laptop is a Lenovo T495s. I'm a big fan because my requirements for a laptop aren't particularly demanding, but while a 5 year old Ryzen 7 is a bit aged, I'd hardly consider it underpowered, at least for my (and many others) needs. Laptops like this can easily be found in great condition and under $200. I spent a little more after a new nvme and maxing out ram.
Sorry to be that gal but other slow hardware not software
Thanks 😅
Just threw Zorin on my secondhand x220, but been using the Thinkpad as a low end test bench so that may change. Runs surprisingly well, although I do need a new battery soon ("dies" at ~40%).
Really surprised when I randomly found out that my tech illiterate friend was running Linux. Back in 2014 or so. Ubuntu. Was no big deal for her. It did everything she wanted.
My mother is very happy now. Bonus points she doesn't call me up and have me dismiss the Microsoft upsell every other update.
She says she doesn't want to break anything but I think she wants me to do it so she doesn't have to give it a nanosecond of a thought. Also she doesn't throw a fit every time she has to wait for updates to finish anymore!
I feel personally attacked lol
Running linux and foss software on my shitty hardware since ever
This is the ideal way.