this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
694 points (96.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

29707 readers
1243 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

...and I don't know which possibility is the least worrying

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Could it just be that whistleblowing is intensely stressful and difficult (reporters, lawyers, harassment from former coworkers and company fanboys, difficulty finding new employment, etc.) I imagine all of that makes whistleblowers far more susceptible to disease and mental issues.

We need stronger whistleblower protection laws. Not just in case companies put out a hit, but also to help the whistleblowers endure and recover from doing the right thing…

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

It's still easily possible that it's just a coincidence.

B-U-T

The fact that people are going to be very suspicious if whistleblowers die, even if it is purely accidental, is yet another reason not to do terrible corporate things. People will always wonder, and Boeing's management deserves the dark cloud that will now hang over their heads.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Or it's a coincidence. N=2

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Still statistically significant, even with a high margin of error our only evidence points towards it being a trend

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There's an xkcd about this

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It statistically significant because middle-aged people who were about to give evidence at a trial dying is not a common occurrence. Happening once is suspicious happening twice is extremely suspicious.

It is not like Boeing is staffed by geriatrics on the edge of life as it is

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Or, as The Onion reports, Boeing intentionally hires employees with suicidal tendencies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

Coincidence or not, it must've caused a chilling effect to other whistleblowers.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They definitely killed the first. Just learned about the second and hearing it was MRSA? So who knows. Maybe they're borrowing some bioweapon tech from their pals at McDonnell Douglas.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They killed the first guy through years of abuse, not by directly killing him.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If Boeing supplied the bullet, it would've shattered before it left the gun

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

This one is going directly to the aviation memes community

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Boeing investors are probably thinking twice.

load more comments
view more: next ›