this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
91 points (98.9% liked)

Canada

7185 readers
514 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ontario is introducing a suite of measures that will crack down on cellphone use and vaping in schools.

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

How a Connecticut middle school won the battle against cellphones https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2024/05/01/school-cellphones-confiscate/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This is gonna be one of those laws that we have but never use. This just doesnt seem possible to me I see teachers on their phones in classes sometimes. I know they are adults but you think teenagers are gonna think the same lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm surprised it took this long. Cellphones should be placed in lockers or into classroom size cellphone holder/chargers that many schools use when they enter class if they are not asked to keep it in their lockers all day, save lunch.

Surprised by some of the comments, def not teachers but sound like folks who might die if you were to separate them from their phones.

Cellphones in classrooms are a problem and shouldn't be allowed whether that's 100% enforceable or not.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How are we going to enforce these?

Because you already can't vape in schools, and it's been possible for boards to ban cellphones, but teachers don't have the backing of administration and they're certainly not protected from liability.

If I were a teacher knowing that if I were to bust little Johnny for TikToking in class or vaping in the washroom, I'd have to face a belligerent student and/or angry parents and the principal, superintendant and ministry would hang me out to dry, I wouldn't bother.

This is just another Ford government way to put the public sector in a lose-lose position so that they can, in this case, start out a voucher system run by private-sector buddies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Thats literally it. And don’t forget how much they’ll add this to the list of their accolades that they boast about at every opportunity.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I haven't taught in Ontario in over a decade, but I don't think the problems with cell phones are unique to Ontario. I'm surprised by the comments here, tbh.

The research is very clear: mental health (and educational outcomes) for youth have taken a nosedive since 2010, when smart phones became commonplace. In the case of educational outcomes, 2010 is the first ever reversal in the otherwise increasing trend.

Smart phones are addiction machines, with predatory apps like SnapChat that are full of dark patterns designed to increase "engagement" (addiction) while having the same short-attention-span-decreasing exposure to video shorts as TikTok that encourage self harm, suicidal ideation, misogyny, and eating disorders. (On average, all of the above within 10 minutes of starting to use the platform.)

Educators cannot compete with addiction machines. If we were writing laws objectively to improve student mental health, smart phones should be illegal for users under age 16 (at least).

This is an example of a shit government making a good decision. I hope the rest of Canada follows.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The research is very clear: mental health (and educational outcomes) for youth have taken a nosedive since 2010, when smart phones became commonplace. In the case of educational outcomes, 2010 is the first ever reversal in the otherwise trend.

Social media also jumped from then to now but I don’t think the problem is using them in class. They will still be used every other hour of the day

Educators cannot compete with addiction machines. If we were writing laws objectively to improve student mental health, smart phones should be illegal for users under age 16 (at least).

I think a law like that would actually be effective but again having it target social media

This is an example of a shit government making a good decision

I really don’t see it working

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

For my kids that were in that age range, and their peers, it meant drama being spread while teacher was trying to keep studenta focused onvthe lesson, rather than their phone screen. it will definitely have an impact, as it will be a short break from it at least.

We had a youth trip, no phones. Kids were complaining and trying to sneak in , but after a few days they were thanking the adults for not having phones allowed, since they could actually relax and enjoy the activities and actual social interaction

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

For my kids that were in that age range, and their peers, it meant drama being spread while teacher was trying to keep studenta focused onvthe lesson, rather than their phone screen. it will definitely have an impact, as it will be a short break from it at least.

Passing notes?

example

I think it might be different than in class and assumes this will be enforced, it’s not like schools couldn’t ban then before

Pagers were banned in my school but not the school over

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Schools should have banned them immediately. So much immediate need to know what another student in another class is doing, and distance bullying.

My kids are now teaching, they said kids 8 years old have Apple watches and are totally distracted from the lesson by notifications, and probably helicopter parent texting them.

I worry our future generations will have no inner peace, as I see a part of life that is missing is being able to enjoy your own company and delve into a single task.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

Sask Apprenticeship and Trade Certification Commission has a similar policy of no electronic devices in the classroom. They can be outside the classroom during breaks(of which there are many). You’re allowed to have them on you, and leave class to take or make a call if you consider it important enough, just can’t have them out in the classroom. While it would have been nice sometimes to have access to network connected devices to supplement the classes, I can also understand the arguments around privacy, and distraction particularly among children/teens.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They would rather sweep the problem under the rug rather than teaching kids about responsible and safe use of technology etc… it’s far easier and less costly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Schools are not replacement for parents.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I agree that parents should be teaching their kids to use technology responsibly. With that being said, a shocking number of parents have no idea how to use technology in a safe or responsible manner.

In fact, I’d say that it’s likely that majority of smartphone users are not tech savvy enough to even recognize the risks of use themselves never mind how to be safe online. Banning the use of these devices is just sweeping the problem under the rug and setting up future generations for failure.

I don’t have an answer to the problem but I don’t think just banning them is helpful. They do need to invest more into future generations instead of coming up with excuses to cut funding and promote private education, etc…

Teachers get the shitty end of the stick, but seriously, if they can’t get kids engaged then they need to go back to the drawing board on the strategy. They need to teach them relevant subjects that are going to help them be successful in life and able to function as productive members of society and do it in a manner that is fun, interesting and inspires and promotes curiosity and creativity.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And what if the parents are dumbfucks/absent? Do the kids not learn the basics of life if they have the bad luck of having shit/no parents?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

So, are schools expected to teach kids how to wipe their ass because they might have dumbfuck parents? Are you seriously expecting the school to teach every fucking basic things of life because bad parenting is a thing? Giving these kids a few hours of forced break from their phone is actually the best thing a school can do.

School is not social services and it does not replace a family.

Do you have any idea what a teacher's job is? Stupidly, and I mean really stupidly underpaid jobs where you work twice the hours you get paid and have to deal with tons of entitled idiots, kids and adults, who, like you expect school to take care of everything. Schools teaches kids a lot of things, read, write, maths, geo, etc., but it can't replace parents. I use to teach in high school, long ago, never fucking again. You want schools to do more? Start paying teacher like you pay doctor, lawyer, dentist or even construction workers and then we'll talk.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

So, are schools expected to teach kids how to wipe their ass because they might have dumbfuck parents?

Yes. I know so many people who didn't learn basic hygiene cuz their parents were dumbfucks. I was one of them. I didn't know that u have to clean under ur foreskin. When my penis started to stink one day, I learnt about this. Another example is brushing ur teeth. I'm quite sure that u rinse ur mouth immediately after brushing, rinsing the toothpaste away. Did uk u were not supposed to do that? Fluorine in toothpaste requires time to act on ur enamel. Hence, while u should spit the toothpaste out, u shouldn't rinse ur mouth always.

How many cases of dental cavities have occurred due to people not learning about this? Cases which could've easily been prevented by good education.

Are you seriously expecting the school to teach every fucking basic things of life because bad parenting is a thing?

Yes. It isn't the kid's fault for having shitty/no parents. It is however society's fault if the kid has to suffer through the effects of shitty/no parents.

Start paying teacher like you pay doctor, lawyer, dentist or even construction workers and then we'll talk.

So we do agree. Of course teachers are incredibly underpaid. Of course they need to be paid as much as doctors, engineers and so on.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 months ago

But what about those damn phones? Kids surely aren't using their phones cuz the classes r boring as shit due to a boring and underfunded education system. Now that we have taken their phones away, they surely won't find some other distraction like bullying the teacher, fooling around with their peers and so on... They surely are going to be model students who always pay attention to the teacher and everything that is taught. /s