this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
373 points (98.4% liked)

Privacy

31628 readers
775 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
373
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I never consent to give my data away or being tracked, but how do you deal with so called legitimate interest? I tried several times to untick them but it is a long list (in fact at the bottom there is a "vendors" link with even longer, much longer list. It took me 10 minutes to get to the bottom of it once).

My questions:

-how can we trust these so called legitimate interests when they are self defined by companies whose business model relies on your data?

-how can we find out what these legitimate interests are and what data it collects?

-are such companies controlled in any way?

-is this kind of consent form compliant with EU gdpr? (normally opt out is to be as easy as opt in, and there is no "refuse all" for these so called legitimate interests).

-what are your strategies against such sites tracking you? Or am I just being paranoid?

The sheer amount vendors is daunting, the Internet really turned into crap

Edit: when clicking Preferences at the bottom the content of the legitimate interested is spelled out for each vendor, so this replies one of my questions.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

They key word here is "their". Not your interest, theirs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Legitimate interests may be those that allow the functionality of the service as such (eg. technical details), all others are blocked or fed with false data to make it clear to them, where they can introduce these "legitimate interests" with Vaseline.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

fair enough, i have a legitimate interest in always blocking trackers and advertisements in every device i own too

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Do not question, just obey.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 5 months ago

Legitimate Interest is an attempt at working around the GDPR using a loophole in the ruling meant to permit processing of data in situations such as when a business has a trading relationship with a client.

However the legal clarification from the EU Commission says: "Your company/organisation must also check that by pursuing its legitimate interests the rights and freedoms of those individuals are not seriously impacted, otherwise your company/organisation cannot rely on grounds of legitimate interest as a justification for processing the data and another legal ground must be found." (see here) and there is a "right to privacy" in EU law.

So supposedly that nearly endless list of "partners" (read: advert providers, trackers and other assorted businesses who make money from breaking people's privacy) cannot use legitimate interest to track you as that would break your right to privacy.

That said, in practice they probably do, and until they get fined hard they'll keep on doing it, so as others said, don't used a Chrome-based browser and use a good Ad Blocker add-on.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Just autowipe cookies on pageloads. Use fast rotating vpn, tunnel through tor twice, run computer in ram only, remove all storage devices.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Amateur advice. Don't own your own device. ask your friends to look up things for you on their devices, then print them out and mail them to your PO Box. Untraceable.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But how did you pay for the PO box? Using cash, think of the fingerprints. And don't forget about the post office spies

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Solution, don't have an address or talk to anyone ever, scavenge your own food.

Untraceable

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Honestly? I wouldn't trust either.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Use Firefox (or a hardened fork like Mull) with uBlock Origin and you'll never see this BS again

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

It’s their interest, not yours.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Your honor, it was not a rape, it was my legitimate interest in sex.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"If it's a legitimate interest, the browser has ways to try to shut that whole thing down"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

How was the browser dressed?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I mean depending on the context it might be a decent defense

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I've seen judges let offenders off light on worse arguments. Unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I've scene abusive and insane spouses that accuse there husband of abuse and even rape

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

No u haven't 🤥

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Your choice of words was absolutely terrible. There is no such thing as a decent defense of rape. Now, an effective defense in our busted legal system? That's a whole different story. But "decent" does not apply in cases of sexual assault and violence. Ever.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If the person is innocent until they are proven guilty. Also it is entirely possible they were innocent

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Your reply is completely unrelated to what I said. There is no such thing as a decent defense for raping someone. If they didn't rape anyone, good! If they did, that is an indefensible act by its very nature.

I made no comment at all on whether or not any specific individual is guilty or not. So I'm really confused what your point is here...?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You are saying that they don't set a defense. No matter the crime, you deserve defense. No one, not even sexual predictors, deserve to be stripped of constitutional rights. Such things also are related to prejudice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

No. Read it again. I never said allegation. I never referenced court proceedings. I said the act of rape is indefensible.

If you commit rape, there is no "decent" defense. If you didn't, then my comment doesn't apply. Simple as that.

There is no excuse for sexual violence, and there never will be.

load more comments
view more: next ›