this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
542 points (96.1% liked)

Political Memes

5402 readers
3341 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: Image is from this Reuters article deconstructing Trump's latest rally.

(page 2) 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 6 months ago (5 children)

The guy on the left looks like a mid 60s Spider-Man villain.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago

He's dressed like a brick wall.

Has he never seen The Wall? Makes me want to spray paint lyrics on his stupid ugly fashy suit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So this is what oxygen deprivation looks like

[–] [email protected] 44 points 6 months ago

That’s a lazy explanation for shitty political views. It completely ignores the lead poisoning and fetal alcohol syndrome mixed in there, too. Not to mention the inbreeding.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 6 months ago

They really do view politics as team sport. I mean just look at how they dress and present themselves in public. If they can't make a show of their trump worship there's probably no point for them. They don't care about policy or ethics or making their lives better, they just want daddy trump to smash a homerun over the left wall and beat them libruls.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter, if people are old or young. Problem is that far right is gaining support over the world, enemies are actively using propaganda and bribe our politicians and we ignore wealth inequality, which lets most wealthy people to override democracy. We either somehow deal with that or future will be really tough for all of us.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But you should also vote and not just give them the win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

What is with the brick suit?

I should say too... roll back the clock 20 years to these bitches mocking John Kerry for getting wounded in Vietnam:

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

I’m guessing it’s “the wall” that Trump always talks about building

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

What is with the brick suit?

Had similar question. I guess "build the wall"?

Possibly "🎵 He's a brick...HOUSE. Mighty mighty, just letting it all hang out🎵" ?

Hard for me to get into the mind of some of these characters.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think it’s-a-me, MAGArio.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Wait so if they’re the brick, can we smash them? I’m down to stomp some goombas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

It’s a shame that liberals expect so much more from their candidates. It leads to a party that gets fractured and just hands the win to Republicans.

Considering our country already gives Republicans a head start with the electoral college, gerrymandering and the senate structure, this fracturing makes it even more difficult for liberals to win.

2016 did so much to screw over liberals. Not just with the president, but with the senate and statewide elections. I honestly believe liberals won’t survive another Trump presidency.

Edit: and Supreme Court… Dems should have had a 5-4 advantage if they just voted for a shitty candidate. Now we will likely be in the minority there for decades.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Dems should have had a 5-4 advantage if they just voted for a shitty candidate.

I was there voting for the shitty candidate in 2016 and everyone else was blabbering about emails and how Trump could never win so why bother voting?

Edit: In 2024 the same morons are blabbering on about genocide Joe and encouraging people to vote for third parties and shit here on Lemmy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 114 points 6 months ago (7 children)

The neat part is that they don't even need to get the most votes to elect a president. They have the advantage of low population density, which means their votes count for more.

Yay democracy.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean in that particular example it’s specifically a limit that was put on our democracy. Which is to say, make sure your state joins the national popular vote compact if they haven’t already:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact

[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 months ago

That's not the only example. The Senate and House also give low population density states outsized influence. So we'll end up with a popularly elected president thwarted by an undemocratic congress. Oh, and senates at the state level have the same problem.

The entire system is fucked and I've given up thinking it's going to do good things. I've been burned too many times.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›