Does this mean they're porting old battlefields?
this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
30 points (94.1% liked)
Games
16645 readers
649 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
A BF1942 port would be awesome.
1942 & BC2 would be great
That’s just insane. Build a game as a live service, end the service after 7 seasons.
What a waste.
I’d love to believe lessons were learned, but I doubt it.
How long is a season ? Like a sport season, so 10 months, or like a trimester ?
I'm gonna huff some copium, but I hope it's because they realize they would have to overhaul 2042 to resemble and feel like the battlefield people remember, and love. 2042 is definitely worth playing in this final state, but it still feels like a hallow shell compared to 3 & 4.
Ctrl-c ctrl-v...$190 please
Not even that.
"Let's make a minimum viable product (if we are lucky) and sell it for $190. It might have features our users don't use(we are guessing) and if there is enough demand we might build onto this and add more in the future...