this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

GenZedong

4302 readers
32 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yes, it’s an actual foreign policy article that says “Unites States”

Yes, I’m dunking on that and not their actual argument because I’m a lib

all 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The world wants less US "influence" abroad; the US populace generally wants less as well, mainly due to being dead tired of paying for the various misadventures rather than any sudden jolt of conscientiousness. During the Trump era when this was written it could even be said that the POTUS (and pretty much no one else in politics- both parties and the blob/"shadow government" beneath them actively worked to sabotage this agenda, the army even admitting afterwards to lying to his face and stalling to keep in Syria despite both the popular demand, and the demand of the elected POTUS) wanted, in some degree, less "influence" abroad, at least in the MENA region, Europe, and perhaps the whole old world to begin with.

The MIC and the warmongering, neocon elites who dream of unlimited tyranny, monopoly, white supremacy and their thousand year reich will never accept such a thing, and for the US and the west in general, those are the only opinions that matter. As we've seen since.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

"The United States want less global influence" sounds about right

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not at all being a lib to just point at a fundamental tenet of their actual argument and laugh at its absurdity. You owe no further engagement. They even followed it with "Hence...". Everything they've built upon this is doomed and a waste of everyone's time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's not what they're dunking on. They're just dunking on the typo, "Unites States"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

The person you were responding to was (tongue in cheek?) implying the typo was a critical part of their argument given that this literally was their thesis