this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Framework Laptop Community

2574 readers
2 users here now

Related links:

Related communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Neat diagram that I hadn't seen before. I plan to keep this image saved so I can refer to it and make sure I am using adequate ports as I swap cards around.

https://knowledgebase.frame.work/en_us/expansion-card-slot-functionality-on-framework-laptop-16-rkUjGm7cn

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

One of the advantages of the Intel 13 in you don't have to worry about this

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

The AMD Framework 13 has similar limitations with its 4 ports too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's very expensive to have all the features for every port.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

@LodeMike @SatyrSack not when it's the only port (cries in oversized phones)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I wonder what this "Higher Power Consumption" means and why that is. Higher than USB-4 or higher than other USB-A slots? I would except a USB-A slot to not use more power than a USB-4 slot.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

IIRC There's an issue with the retiming chips that retransmit the USB4 signals over to the A style and how they're able to interact with the rest of the system. It causes the chips to stay awake and waste energy. The same issue is present on the AMD 13 framework; something to do with the AMD USB4 implementation. The 3.2 ports don't have the same issue.

Basically the port will still work in that configuration but the battery life will suffer.