Seems like pseudoscience
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
Do you have alternative theories? Or are you just armchair dunking?
The thing is, I doubt Russia has the capability to do something for so long and get away with it.
I think it's more likely China, in terms of such capability that is.
The investigation here heavily relies on series of coincidences between travel records of Russian agents and accidents history.
Wasn't there that event at US Steel that gave Havana syndrome? It was also released like a year ago that the syndrome is not caused by foreign intelligence or weapons...
Link to the original report there shows 404 error.
In case it matters, current report comes from The Insider - media created by Russian dissidents.
Why would the CIA change their mind after 1 year? They were investigating for years and they conclude it's not a weapon, then a year later they say 'nope April fools LOL'
This particular investigation was underway for 3 years. If your only argument is LOL then I guess it's not use in suggesting you to read it.
Need to create support for a war with Russia
Is Havana syndrome anything more than mass psychogenic illness? There's a lot of hay been made about these people's illness, but I haven't seen any evidence of an actual issue or anything remotely explainable with current technology.
The article that this thread is under points out other possible causes. If you read it, it may answer your question. They suppose that it may be a sonic weapon used by a russian operative.
Sonic weapons are very real tech that is here now.
And yet have never been shown to have the alleged effects, and haven't been seen pointed at Americans
Sonic weapons are really easy to detect, they should have good evidence if it is but I've not seen any.
The article is talking about possible correlations, not 100% locked down proof. It never claims to have definitive facts.
Some of the health effects reported do line up with sonic weapon. Nausea, dizziness/etc, so there is some interesting overlap, especially with deployed Russian operatives in the same area. Method + motive possibly connecting.
An American military investigator examining instances of the syndrome told 60 Minutes that the common link between victims of the syndrome was a "Russia nexus".
Greg Edgreen explained: "There was some angle where they had worked against Russia, focused on Russia, and done extremely well."
He also said the official US bar of proof to show Russian involvement had been set too high, as his country did not want to "face some very hard truths".
Crucially, this started happening in late 2016, and reports became more widespread (including Canadian foreign ministry personnel) in 2017.
TL;DR Trump or one of his toadies decided to made the burden of proof insanely high because Trump likes Putin.
Relevant username?
It wasn’t me!
Ok shaggy 🙄
Hmm...
FartsWithAnAccent is wary