Comic Strips

I guess it depends on how we’re going to define capitalism.

Cooperation between humans, in a state of nature, ie before civilization, incentivizes free trade. Why fight the dudes on the other side of the creek if you can trade with them?

Why fight with them when you could leave them alone entirely?

If communicating, why not trade with them?

If you want all their stuff for yourself, is it really worth those four gourds and a bead necklace to fight to the death for it?

Coercion is costly, and it’s more costly the closer you are in strength to another person.

Trying to coerce somebody your own size is a bad idea. Trying to coerce someone smaller is inefficient assuming they’re not trying to kill you, which they won’t be because that’s suicidal on their part.

So the first arrangement we had with other people was free trade, governed by everyone’s capacity for violence and willingness to fight back if attacked. Probably less human-v-human hatred when nature was so relatively powerful too.

This is before civilization mind you, when we just had tribes.

In a separate thread it might be good to consider whether the classic dating of civilization to have dawned when agriculture created food surplus, is the first historical example of the capitalist/worker relationship. But that should be in a separate thread.

People die of starvation in a world that literally has enough food for everyone - because speculating with food is more profitable than feeding them

Give me an example of starvation, past or present, that resulted from something other than uncontrollable weather, or government interfering with the food market?

I’ll take as many examples as you can give me, but one is probably a good place to start.

People die of diseases that have known cures with low production cost

I agree

because the market will only finance medical research if the resulting drug comes with a net gain price tag.

Wouldn’t people dying of diseases with known cures be a problem with the market not producing known drugs, and not a problem of research?

Wal-mart’s recent entry into the insulin market comes to mind. A capitalist endeavor if there ever was one, immediately rushing in to make profits by saving lives the moment they are permitted to do so by the government.

As a result of Wal-Mart’s acting like a profit seeking capitalist endeavor, insulin dropped in price by like 80%.

Not sure if I’m being clear enough here: the opening of free market conditions around insulin led to it becoming cheap enough to allow people to live.

Whatever was keeping insulin so expensive before that, it definitely wasn’t the free market.

There are literal wars being fought and people being shot for economic gains.

Right. That’s bad. Not very capitalist though, given capitalism is defined by free markets, voluntary exchange, and wage labor. Those are the alternative to shooting people for their stuff, if you didn’t know that.

Capitalism is the free market system. It’s the one where to get something from someone, you have to get them to agree to give it to or trade it to you.

Private ownership, voluntary exchange. Capitalism. If you consider this to be “civilization”, that’s great. So do I. Trade is civilized. Consent to exchange goods is civilized. It’s also called a free market.

Capitalism is civilization. That’s a great way to put it.

If capitalism happens at the expense of the masses, why are the masses getting wealthier? That doesn’t make any sense.

Capitalism, civilization, whatever you want to call the places where people only work together willingly, those so-called “free markets”, those places produce enormous quantities of wealth, and everyone in them gets wealthier. Those are the places you have your main problems being obesity, addiction to endless entertainment and novelty, boredom. Wealthy people problems.

Civilization is a comfortable place. I’ve been in both places and I’d sooner choose to be fat, addicted to video games and pot, and bored, before I would choose to be malnourished, cold, and scared.

I mean, unless there’s something fun going on in the second one, and I know it’s going to end in finite time

To be fair, OP is also confusing capitalism with civilization. This is definitely Lemmy's "say the line, Bart"

TIL agriculture = capitalism. I bet they think the free market is exclusive to capitalism too.

This whole exchange is hilarious as the DK is strong in your counterpart. The best part is how smug and condescending they are (winter child lolol) despite clearly having no idea what they're talking about. My money is on him being a libertarian.

Edit: hoooooly shit, I was right!