this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
377 points (87.9% liked)

Technology

59429 readers
2967 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Setting aside the usual arguments on the anti- and pro-AI art debate and the nature of creativity itself, perhaps the negative reaction that the Redditor encountered is part of a sea change in opinion among many people that think corporate AI platforms are exploitive and extractive in nature because their datasets rely on copyrighted material without the original artists' permission. And that's without getting into AI's negative drag on the environment.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 54 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Maybe an unpopular opinion, but I like AI art. It can be fun and interesting, I play around with a couple engines myself. I occasionally use the imagery to kick-start my imagination or as inspiration for things I might be working on or thinking about. It’s useful to give your brain a “starting point.”

What I don’t like is people trying to pass off AI computer generated images as some form of accomplishment for themselves (excluding working out a good prompt or modifiers, that can be a bit of work) or trying to pass off the imagery as real in any way. Real IRL or like “I painted this.”

As far as the corporate models scraping content…yeah, they are definitely playing the usual game that it’s ok for them to fuck over the little guy but heaven help you if you’re a day late with a payment to them or torrent a movie.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

This needs to change : there is no AI art. Art is something humans do, and AI is something that does not exist.

There cannot be AI art.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Agi doesn't exist, saying ai doesn't exist is like saying physics doesn't exist because unified field theory isn't a thing yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

“Art is whatever the artist chooses it to be.” And I’d also call art whatever the beholder chooses it to be. If Dog Art is something that exists, AI Art is something that exists.

Whether you think in the case of AI the artist is the LLM or the prompter, that’s irrelevant.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

AI image tools are useful for one thing and one thing only.

Putting Godzilla in the most ridiculous situations possible.

https://forums.mst3k.com/t/dall-e-fun-with-an-ai/24697/7734

Start at the bottom. It doesn't start with Godzilla, but eventually we discovered the true meaning of AI image creation. Also because it's getting close to 8000 posts at this point.

We really like putting Godzilla in ridiculous situations.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›