this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

fucknestle

938 readers
1 users here now

a community dedicated to hating nestle!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On devices with OLED screens, the more pixels on the screen are lit up, the more power the screen consumes. So on the majority of smart phones these days, dark mode will slightly reduce energy consumption. Devices with LCD screens will likely show no difference, and we're talking a fairly negligible amount of power here anyway.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

So you are saying nestle could contribute more by not using child labour in African cocoa plantations?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

According to a Purdue University Study dark mode can save 3 to 9% of your battery if you're on auto brightness. Let's say your average phone uses 15Wh per day (5.475 kWh per year). Let's say 5 billion people use smartphones. That's around 30 TWh for total yearly smartphone consumption.

So if everyone was using dark mode, it could save around 0.8 to 2.5 TWh a year in the best case scenario. But that is if everything on your phone was dark mode. Not sure how much time people spend browsing websites percentually.

That's around 0.1 to 2.7 times the daily electric energy production of all nuclear power plants.

The world electricity production is around 23000 TWh per year, so you could save around 0.0036% to 0.01% of yearly energy consumption by switching everyone to dark mode.

Such impactful, much environment, wow

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

that study talks about oled displays btw, shit's not gonna change for regular backlit devices

word of the day is greenwashing, fucking engrave it into your brain -- get the words for the phenomena and all that shit

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Now calculate how many nestle wells that steal people's water that makes.