this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
786 points (92.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26781 readers
2977 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Make Purple Great Again!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Except that,

  • Our objective news - is really just a mess of different slants, some being propaganda, that are not censured even when their content approaches slander due to heavy political bias.

  • Our combating disinformation - is largely unexisting to the point that several large social media providers have abolished or acted against the control they had for doing so and that their CEOs shamelessly meet with presidential candidates with ties to them.

  • Our glorious leader - is hardly accepted as a glorious leader and the portion of the society that does also tend to have absolutely no qualms about becoming more authoritarian by their own admission.

  • Our great religion - is criticized within the country and an increasing number of people are becoming atheists.

  • Our noble populace - Our heroic adventures - Ok, who is writing this meme? Who thinks their society thinks this way? Half the other populace disagrees with the other half, even going so far as to be described as hate, and any mythos of heroic is easily dismissed the moment it becomes convenient to do so not to mention the amount of criticism armed forces get.

This is whataboutism 101. Not all sides are completely black and white, but not all sides are equally grey.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't think this comic was about you or your country. It's about how nationalists frame things in their own vs. other countries.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

I feel like the artist originally wanted to make this primarily medieval themed. But then realisied "Oh yeah, news and stuff are a thing." And then just added laptops and antennas.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago

It’s been added on to. The original didn’t have the radio towers or “time out” area

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The font is slightly different as well

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

True. It's very obvious when you look at the "E".

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Someone shared a different version that doesn't have those newer stuff. That might've been the original.

https://lemmy.ca/comment/7948433

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There is a reason the Geneva Convention (and the Hague protocols before it) prohibit assassination. That reason is that the Glorious Leader and the Wicked Despot have more in common with each other than they do with us peons. Don't anyone get too excited during our "war" (population reduction, economic stimulus package, domestic troubles distraction). Invest in defense contractors, the elite will keep them fed.

Remember the average dude in China, Iran, Russia, etc is no more interested in dying to aggrandize his rich owners than you are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I mean I would rather be caught dead than be purple

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

PURPLE GOOD YELLOW BAD 😤😤

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

Typical sense of entitlement from a purple, they're all the same, that primitive purple brain can't comprehend other light waves exist.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Nation-states were a bad idea

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Alternatives?

I see 2:

  • full hegemonic domination of one nation state where everyone gets their basics met. Star trek style.

  • intense local tribalism where you're doing a whole lot more defending your land than you are now

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (5 children)

anarchism, i.e. bottom-up democracy and federal structures. Read up on Rojava for example.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'd go for the second, with pleasure. Better spend my time fighting for hometown than working for a big profit-driven company.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Or maybe there’s a dozen alternatives that could work better and both of us are staring at this from the bottom of a pro-hierarchy well that we’ve been stuck in ever since one guy convinced another one he should be in charge.

I don’t have a full solution, I just want us to be flexible enough to figure one (or more) out.

“The international ideal unites the human race”

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

One guy will always convince another of that. If the other guy disagrees, well, time for sticks and stones.

My point is you either go small, and groups self assemble however you want, but you'll have many neighbors who might not see it your way.

Or you go big, and everyone's efforts go to one shared goal, and everyone is a equal "citizen". Ideally with collective shared goals folks are doing ok.

Or you go medium, which is what we have now. Some groups are positioned and prepared to do good stuff, and others are fighting with and nail just to hold it together. There's gonna be friction with neighbors, like with "small" but the problem is "mediums" got some real big sticks and stones.

There's no right answer and I obviously didn't cover everything. But without groups of some kind, people will get picked off. There's no period of human history that disagrees with me.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

People like you make me sad.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Realists?

Provide a single example of anything aside from what I described, in any period of human history that both:

  • did not maintain power through economic or just militaristic dominance of their local region

  • did not experience conflict with their neighbors.

They either had cohesive, hegemonic domination within their borders and geographic separation from rivals, or had challenges with bordering nation states.

I personally hope for a star trek future

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Is this like a sound scientific theory that has some relevance to modern times? I could list off a myriad of "this thing has never existed in human history" making current times unique and possibly different when looking at cultural nuances. I get what you're saying totally, but this is a new era of history with the formation of Alliances like NATO and the EU that has really just started in regards to our span of time. Also, we tend to only hear about the "bloody" years of a society. One war can outshine hundreds or thousands of years with prosperity and peace so the whole doom thing seems like fear mongering.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

"Shogun" tackles this really well.

[–] [email protected] 84 points 8 months ago (13 children)

This feels dangerously close to some EnlightenedCentrism nonse

[–] [email protected] 62 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure whether the version of this I saw previously was the original and this post was cropped, or if this post is the original and the other text was added later. But I much prefer the context here:

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Hmmm it's almost as if politics and ethics are very nuanced and one answer is never correct in every situation..

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

One side thinks the answer is "do fascism", so I think it may be fair to conclude that one of the proposed answers is at least wrong in every situation.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Yeah i've learned not to trust this kind of simmetrical worldview, even when it makes me feel smart for being above it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It is quite literally implying "both sides actually same!"

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (23 children)

It's addressing the concept of demonization, a la Israel and Palestine. It's via these mechanisms that other people are dehumanized.

Not Karen v Karen at the pta meeting.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

"Glorious leader" sure sounds like a pretty direct reference to the Kim dynasty.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

This and the rabbit/duck flag.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (9 children)

Rule of the world. The most violent ape gets to continue his lineage. To continue to pretend that we're more than violent apes is naive.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 130 points 8 months ago (8 children)

I read "brutish" as "british" on first glance

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you ever need to check, this site has up to date information. https://arethebritsatitagain.org

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Which surprisingly does not change the meaning as much, as one would think it would.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Same, and I was like well if the shoe fits...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

you must acquit

[–] [email protected] 31 points 8 months ago (1 children)

More often than not that has been the case :)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Much less often than not, by a colossal margin. They did have a good run, though.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

What I get from this image is that one side will call the other side evil while the other side will do the same

It's best to look at the actions of a person or group rather than what they state they are doing

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago

I think about this whenever I see legislative efforts to "prevent disinformation" XD

I hate disinformation as much as the next guy, but we gotta be careful who we give charte blanche to censor information XD

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›