this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
17 points (75.8% liked)

Games

16729 readers
556 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

This game needed more time in the oven.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Hrmm still no basic city map?

I literally forgot about this game I wish I could get a refund.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I'm always sad to see so much dislike for this game, I absolutely love it and will continue to come back to it. Most of the things people mention are failures on their part to understand what the game is and how basic things, both in the real world and in game design, work.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Bold claim to say that the reason people dont like the game is because the players play the game wrong.

Even if it was secretly the goty, and you just needed to stand on your head and cross your eyes to really play it.... Thats still the games fault for not making it obvious how to play it "correctly," no?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

I also enjoyed my playthrough of the game, and am looking forward to what Bethesda does. I've gotten my money's worth, but I'm hoping they manage to do much more with the game than what's currently available (but it's fine if they don't as well).

I also think that a lot of the criticisms are completely valid -- Personally the missions and story were enjoyable enough for me, and the systems were neat to explore, but 8 years on from FO4, and a generation later and the game still suffers from the same engine limitations, further exacerbated by the scope they decided to reach for.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Please, it's not that complicated or hard to understand that exploration in Starfield is unrewarding. It's great you enjoy it, but qualitatively it doesn't come close even to Bethesda's past titles.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

The biggest issues definitely are not a case of people not understanding the world or game design.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That is an impressive comment, but I will just go back to playing the superior game, morrowind.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Comparing anything to Morrowind is unfair, and you know it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I don't think I'll be returning to Starfield until they fix the underlying issue: the infinite pond of shallow exploration that yields no rewards for exploring the next point of interest other than random generic loot.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Is that a patchable problem?

That feels like an issue that is caused by the games core gameplay loop.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I assume it's possible, but will BGS commit the time and resources to overhauling their Point of Interest system?

The issue comes down to environmental storytelling. I can travel to any planet in the galaxy and have a good chance of encountering a Science Tower filled with Space Pirates, and in that tower, there will be the same 5 terminals with 2 or 3 slice of life emails. And I can do this multiple times. The only thing that changes is the loot tables and the enemy levels.

How can we fix that? Can you create multiple engaging storylines that populate in the terminals and in the environment at random? Can you create a storyline that spans multiple locations on a planet and as you uncover more and more it leads you to a handcrafted POI with a unique reward?

Fallout 3 did this in a more basic way with its A/B random encounters. And that mechanic added excitement and unpredictability to the world.

Or can you create procedurally generated locations and dungeons? As it stands, a landscape is just populated with a bunch of POIs that never deviate from their blueprint.

The outpost building system would, from a layman's perspective, lend itself to procedurally generated locations.

I don't think we'll see any of that patched in since there's no money in it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I don't know that they can fix that at this point. Modders aren't interested in it either considering the core issues.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. It would be nice to have a game included with my game. It's asking a lot, I know.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Bethesda obviously count on modders to do that for free...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Maybe one day I'll try it again. That's an impressive list.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's a lot of patch notes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

It's a very broken game.