this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
56 points (72.6% liked)

Games

16746 readers
726 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

No, one company isn’t ‘forcing’ diversity into all your favorite video games

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

It's still a safer bet to avoid whatever they consult on, they've an eye for trash writing and they thrive on "fixing" that. And companies that hire them are just out there to make a quick buck rather than creating a good story, experience or game.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago

its a good scam create problem that you are the solution to and you never have to face the consequences of what you do because you never make your own games you always work on other peoples games as consulted so that it can never be traced back to you unless you make it public and publish it on your own sweet baby site as promotion to do it again.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

In this thread:

"How dare they ask the company what it does. The headline must be written first because it's what I read first."

"If we assume the problem doesn't exist, then why is there a solution?"

"Artists seeking consultation sounds like censorship. Especially if they recommend it to other artists!"

"The only reason you'd try to avoid offending people is so you can have sex at them."

Yeah can't imagine why these companies have people check their work now.

load more comments
view more: next ›