this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

18633 readers
30 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Shots fired ๐Ÿ”ฅ

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

i'm the bestest browser guys, i swear. source: trust me bro.

(I use firefox before y'all come for my neck)

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Its kind of like Simplex Chat claiming to be more secure and private than everything else. (Solid platform though)

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think this is a shitpost of the highest order. If this appears to everyone (?) it adds nothing, and the crappy table is just astonishingly blatant cherry-picking.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I think it's a work of love. :)

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Chrome and Google 4 LYFE bro!

load more comments (5 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

That's how all these tables are. If a vendor presents a table comparing themselves to competitors, it's going to be cherry picked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Feel free to test your fingerprinting resistance on a stock Firefox-install. https://www.amiunique.org/

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So it says that the fingerprint is unique. What information do I gain from that?

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The information that Google iframe gains on almost every site is that it is you visiting that site, as verified by your unique fingerprint. Into your profile it goes.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah it actually really bad that they can identify every single unique user like this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I didn't get that but I guess because I have a plugin to give me nice backgrounds on new tabs.

But yeah, shots fired. Nice!

The only issue is that only already existing Firefox users see this, and we already know this.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

They need to add a row for ~~"Owned by a foreign superpower"~~"Owned by the Chinese government" and a check for Opera.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@DannyMac @Napain They are all owned by foreign powers.
Oh, your definition of "foreign" is non-US?

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On one hand, yeah. On the other hand, that could be a point in its favor, depending on your threat model. After all, if you're American, China can't prosecute you for secrets it learns from Opera the way the FBI could prosecute you for secrets it learns from Google.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Literally every single entry is owned by a foreign superpower.

load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ