this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

32297 readers
873 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's less impressive when you remember they're letting the majority of Indian children live with severe malnourishment to do this...

It's like NK bragging about their rockets.

When you don't take care of the necessities, it's easy to do other shit.

Like a person wearing flashy clothes, driving new cars, and living in a giant house. Then finding out their over leveraged and bankrupt.

Edit:

Downvoting won't feed the children Modi is sacrificing

The prevalence of Zero-Food in India marginally declined from 20.0% (95% CI: 19.3%–20.7%) in 1993 to 17.8% (95% CI: 17.5%–18.1%) in 2021. There were considerable differences in the trajectories of change in the prevalence of Zero-Food across states. Chhattisgarh, Mizoram, and Jammu and Kashmir experienced high increase in the prevalence of Zero-Food over this time period, while Nagaland, Odisha, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh witnessed a significant decline. In 2021, Uttar Pradesh (27.4%), Chhattisgarh (24.6%), Jharkhand (21%), Rajasthan (19.8%) and Assam (19.4%) were states with the highest prevalence of Zero-Food. As of 2021, the estimated number of Zero-Food children in India was 5,998,138, with the states of Uttar Pradesh (28.4%), Bihar (14.2%), Maharashtra (7.1%), Rajasthan (6.5%), and Madhya Pradesh (6%) accounting for nearly two-thirds of the total Zero-Food children in India. Zero-Food in 2021 was concerningly high among children aged 6–11 months (30.6%) and substantial even among children aged 18–23 months (8.5%). Overall, socioeconomically advantaged groups had lower prevalence of Zero-Food than disadvantaged groups.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(23)00067-6/fulltext

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All the countries with space programs have people in some form of dire strait. Starving, homeless, lack of medical care… Are you saying achievements like this aren’t allowed to take place at all until every problem is taken care of? I can assure you that at no point in civilization has there been times where someone wasn’t in a bad spot while society moved forward. Yeah, India has some big problems, and huge wealth disparity is a problem that many places face alongside India, but you can’t shut down progress because all the other problems can’t be solved.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By that logic we should clap everytime North Korea launches a rocket.

And there's not really any "progress" here.

Modi has publicly said he's doing all this space stuff not for technological/scientific advancement.

It's a PR campaign to make foreigners think India is a world power. And to pay for it, he's letting the "lower caste" people go thru hell

Honestly, I thought people wouldn't be dumb enough to fall for it. But I guess Modi was right, here you are defending him

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Modi can be relegated to the annals of history for all I care, your assertion that this program was a waste is blatantly incorrect. 40% of Indian children are malnourished compared to 17% in the US. Indians don't have to sell blood to survive, and primary care is available to all citizens. Rx prices are controlled, and abortion has been legal for decades, and recently has been made free as well. The govt doesn't have just one mandate, and this is an achievement of the space organization not politicians. No one is implying modi was actually sitting and working to land the space craft.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

"Majority" of Indian children?