this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
808 points (99.1% liked)

World News

40548 readers
2951 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, in a private meeting inadvertently broadcast via a hot mic, warned that Donald Trump is seriously considering annexing Canada to secure its critical mineral resources.

Speaking to business and labor leaders, Trudeau claimed Trump’s administration is keenly aware of Canada’s resource wealth and sees annexation as a means to control it.

The comments, cut off after staff realized they were audible, underscore growing economic and political tensions.

He also stressed the need to diversify trade, noting, “Geography means we’re always going to both benefit and be challenged by trade with the United States.”

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Fascists have to have an Enemy within....AND an enemy without.

trump has created the first

now he's creating the second.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 days ago (16 children)

Ya know, even with all the apt comparisons to Hitler and Putin, one thing I didn't have on my bingo card was him actually trying to expand US territory by invading and annexing other countries. I thought that was one big difference.

Everything else I could imagine is now in progress: Disregard/end of the Constitution and rule of law--check. Dismantling of democracy into an authoritarian dictatorship--check. Mass deportations and concentration camps--check. Full-on implementation of Project 2025--check. Blatant corruption, lawlessness and self-enrichment for trump family and oligarchs--check. Implementation of Christian Nationalist policies--check. Dismantling of federal agencies and beneficial aid programs--check (so far DOJ/FBI, USAID, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Dept of Education).

As yet unchecked, but only a matter of time (it's only been 3 weeks!): dismantling of additional agencies and programs: SNAP, medicaid first, then social security, medicare, all the stuff they hate. Use of military against civilians, requirement to carry ID papers with proof of citizenship, sham elections, and more!

Unanticipated by me: Musk given free reign to dismantle whatever parts of the US government he feels like, and now invasion and annexation of other countries and territories!?! In the sights: Panama Canal zone, Greenland, Canada, and Gaza. Could this really happen?

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago (3 children)

"United States declares war on United States after unprovoked attack on NATO ally Canada"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago

He inadvertantly told us what Trump has explicitly told us?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Damn, Wolf Warrior diplomacy is even more odious when the US does it.

[–] [email protected] 76 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

Trump is using Putins playbook. Constantly threaten to annex your neighbors. Neighbors take those threats seriously and start to build up a standing army at the border. Convince populous that the neighbors are threatening the nation and are preparing for an invasion. Yada yada yada. Start a “special military op“ and invade neighbor.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

This might go very badly for Canada. I want it to go badly for the US, but let's try to be real here for a second. Doesn't a very, very large proportion of Canada live in like five cities? The USAF could have that paved in an afternoon, more or less by itself.

Edit: somebody pointed out that Canada has nukes. That could definitely change the equation.

Edit 2 edit boogaloo: unclear if Canada has nukes, citation needed. De-striking until I can find some proof.

Trudeau needs to take this shit serious and start looking into bringing EU and Aussie troops/armor/air defence over for long term "training exercises". If you're Canadian and reading this, you need to be preparing. Get out of the city if you can; if not, start preparing a bug out bag, keep your gas tank over half full, and start preparing enough supplies to shelter in place for at least three days for however many people are in your household. Count on losing power, water, gas, and other utilities. If you have a gun, make sure you know how to aim it, use it, clean it, clear any jams, etc. before you need it. If you don't have a gun, give some real thought to it; ask yourself what Vasily Zaitsev would do. I hope it doesn't come to this; I want to apologize that this is happening, though I know it's not worth the pixels it's printed on.

I have hope that it won't happen. Most USians have a very positive view of Canada, and this anti-canadian rhetoric is way, way, way out of left field for a wide majority of us. I can't see any but a very small minority of people thinking this is good. I have a small hope that our military will make the right choice if the time comes.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

Don't trust uncited information. I am sure we do not have nukes. Look up the nuclear nonproliferation treaty for Canada, we not only don't have any, but haven't stored them for any other country since 1984.

You can begin here as a starting point:

https://www.international.gc.ca/world-monde/issues_development-enjeux_developpement/peace_security-paix_securite/nuclear_radiological-nucleaire_radiologique.aspx?lang=eng

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

You are very welcome.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The air force isn't bombing Canadian cities, GTFO with that.

Unlike Ukraine Canada has nukes, so yeah....

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

I am certain we do not. Do you have a citation?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ah, I thought I had seen elsewhere that they didn't. Good.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

We don't, I don't know where the guy above got his info, but we ratified the nuclear nonproliferation treaty in 1969 and then completed deconstructing/removing them in 1984.

Someone can post citation otherwise, but I have lived here my entire life and remembered the articles from when they were all decommissioned.

As far as I know, we haven't even stored nuclear weapons or relevant systems for other countries since we had some belonging to the US at CFB Goose Bay in Labrador. We had them removed as part of our stance against nuclear arms in 1984 as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Two things to remember about that guy:

1)Trump is stupid

2)Trump is the president

Whatever we do, we all must work around those two things. Point 2 implies that he is not permanent, but who knows what the future might hold.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›