this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2567 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

No detectable amount of tritium has been found in fish samples taken from waters near the crippled Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant, where the discharge of treated radioactive water into the sea began a month ago, the government said Monday.

Tritium was not detected in the latest sample of two olive flounders caught Sunday, the Fisheries Agency said on its website. The agency has provided almost daily updates since the start of the water release, in a bid to dispel harmful rumors both domestically and internationally about its environmental impact.

The results of the first collected samples were published Aug. 9, before the discharge of treated water from the complex commenced on Aug. 24. The water had been used to cool melted nuclear fuel at the plant but has undergone a treatment process that removes most radionuclides except tritium.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

A banana naturally has has around 15 Bq of potassium 40. Assuming a volume of 100 mL, mashed bananas have around 400 Bq/L.

Currently, the treated water has around 250 Bq/L, around a fifth of mashed bananas. In other words, a banana smoothie could easily be more radioactive then the water as it was released.

The banana's potassium 40 has a half life of more then a billion years, so it's not going anywhere, unlike the tritium who's amount will half every 11 years. Also, potassium is concentrated by many plants and animals, while tritium is not.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

The power of the sun..... in the palm of my hand

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Dangit, now how am I gonna get my piscine superpowers/fish shaped tumors?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I remember commenting on a post where China condemned Japan for doing this.

I asked ppl there "is this actually bad or is this kind of par for the course of getting rid of the dangers left behind in Fukushima?" And most of them were like "it's not a common occurrence but it's not inherently dangerous and it's not that big of a deal"

To me it looks like the vast majority of objections to this came from strategic propaganda related to domestic relations of China and/or other nations.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Its also classic anti-nuclear power FUD.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't doubt nuclear power works. I just know how humans work. Everything we build we also destroy. Let's not take the planet with us.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This here is also classic anti-nuclear power FUD.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

This here is capitolist FUD, but I'm sure in all your great wisdom think humans can be trusted not to fuck up a 5th time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There's nothing more capitalist than pushing coal and oil.

And any rational green energy advocate knows it'll take us decades to build enough solar/wind to fill the fossil fuels gap, but would only take us a couple years to fill that demand with nuclear and also produce fewer emissions. That's simple numbers.

So are you just irrational or a coal-snorting capitalist yourself?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

Show me this "fossil fuel gap" when it takes a decade for a nuclear power plant to run at full efficiency.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sample size: 64

Also, are there other things like Caesium-137 that pose a risk?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

All that other stuff was filtered out, but the tritium is near impossible to separate, because it is chemically identical to the hydrogen in normal water.

As for caesium, there are still detectable amounts of Cs-137 in most of the word from the thousands of atomic bomb tests. It's half life is just 30 years, but it will still be detectable for a hundred years or so because of the huge amount we released.