this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
1601 points (98.6% liked)

pics

19745 readers
871 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Beautiful 😍

[–] [email protected] 55 points 6 days ago

Man baby needs to be held accountable for his actions.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 155 points 6 days ago (9 children)

Brave protest. Pretty sure Nazi imagery is illegal in Germany. Somebody correct me if I’m wrong

[–] [email protected] 75 points 6 days ago (15 children)

There's plenty of "fair use" cases which would allow it.

Β§86a STGB allows for the use of "symbols of anti-constitutional organizations" in cases of:

  • art (e.g. the movie "Downfall")
  • scientific research
  • education
  • news or other broadcast (covering Nazi Protests in the US for example, German news station don't have to censor the Swastika flags or the like)

And probably applying in this case - in protesting said anti-constitutional organizations, for example a crossed out Swastika as a form of protest against Nazis is still very much legal.

Most important is the intent. If you plan to use those symbols with the intent of furthering the ideology of anti-constitutional organizations, it is probably forbidden. The intention has to be clearly against those organizations, otherwise it might be actionable.

Btw the communist party of Germany, the KPD is also considered an anti-constitutional organization and therefore it's symbols are forbidden in the same way.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 440 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Making the German state officially state that this is Nazi imagery would be a worthwhile win lol.

[–] [email protected] 88 points 6 days ago

lol didn’t even think of that

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 6 days ago (4 children)

It is with few exceptions. Given that it looks like the purpose is to call out a Nazi supporter I think they wouldn't get in trouble for that though.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 184 points 6 days ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 348 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The photo of Ellen and the β€œHEIL” appear to be projected onto the wall of the factory

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

Yeah, it is what i thought, but i was not sure if it was photoshop or something

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί