this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Ask Lemmygrad
799 readers
11 users here now
A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is just vibes by me, but I feel like Wikipedia can be fine if it's not a contentious political topic. AFAIK, no one is being asked to give up illicit wealth gained from their Middle Ages slaves.
Science articles tend to be decent, for different reasons.
Yeah that's the real insidiousness of projects like Wikipedia and BBC. They are mostly written by normal people passionate about what they're doing, and are accurate in a majority of cases except for those that are damaging to liberalism.
Adding onto my comment just in case some lib stumbles upon it weeks or months later and thinks "Tankies are delusional because it is more likely that he's being biased instead of a single section of wikipedia being biased when other sections are good"
Look up "CCP" and "Gulf of Tonkin Incident" and see how it's written. Go to the talk section to see the justification for writing it that way and see the anticommunist bias inherent in the system.