Conservative

384 readers

5 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Panera Bread faces boycott calls (www.newsweek.com)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

50 comments fedilink hide all child comments

and when has a left boycott ever been effective? Never.

That said, I thought the exemption for bakeries was strange.

Greg Flynn doesn't own Panera. He owns some franchise units. JAB holdings is the one that owns Panera.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

That is not what I said. If you want to have honest discussion, this is not the way to do it.

Here are your exact words.

A person can represent multiple companies.

You can't represent multiple companies simultaneously, you should look up feduciary responsibilities.

I’m putting in the same level of effort as you.

Just admit you're lazy and/or couldn't find a source supporting your insane claims. The 1st step to improving as a person is to take responsibilities for your actions.

I already explained this, just for you to strawman it.

I'm starting to believe you misuse logically fallacies incorrectly as a defense mechanism for your poor arguments.

You still haven't listed a single right you people were fighting for. All you've claimed is white nationalists (bad people) want to take away rights (bad things). You haven't provided any evidence that they want to take away a specific right or even listed which rights they are trying to take away.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You haven’t provided any evidence that they want to take away a specific right or even listed which rights they are trying to take away.

Or that they are white nationals

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You can’t represent multiple companies simultaneously, you should look up feduciary responsibilities.

And the law doesn't always reflect reality.

Just admit you’re lazy and/or couldn’t find a source supporting your insane claims. The 1st step to improving as a person is to take responsibilities for your actions.

With you? Nah. It's not worth the effort. Next time try to be honest about what I an saying and maybe I'll put in the effort.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

And the law doesn’t always reflect reality.

Nor do many of your comments.

With you? Nah. It’s not worth the effort. Next time try to be honest about what I an saying and maybe I’ll put in the effort.

Admitting you're too lazy/can't find a source is a step forward. You get a gold star.

Still can't list one single right.